cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1874605

A 17-year-old from Nebraska and her mother are facing criminal charges including performing an illegal abortion and concealing a dead body after police obtained the pair’s private chat history from Facebook, court documents published by Motherboard show.

  • Monomate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To be fair, if the mother/daughter communicated through WhatsApp they’d not be caught, because it’s an end-to-end encrypted messaging platform. But as they chose FB Messenger, they got vulnerable to a court order forcing Facebook to hand over data.

    • preacher37@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is WhatsApp open source? Even Signal I’m a bit on edge, why would you trust WhatsApp which is owned by Facebook?

      • Monomate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        WhatsApp was not created by Facebook. It used to be an independent company which major selling point was offering free encrypted messaging to the masses, which was mostly relevant to non-US users as they’re charged for SMS usage more directly (it doesn’t come free and unlimited on most plans).

        It was bought by Facebook in 2014 and by 2016 they implement end-to-end encryption. There’s already various cases of courts around the world trying to compel WhatsApp to hand over messages but they didn’t because they simply don’t store the messages on their servers, and when the messages pass through their servers they’re encrypted by design.

        • pips@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That said, the messages are stored locally on the device or in a cloud backup unless you disable that. If the device is unlocked, the messages are available to whoever has the device.

          • Monomate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            At this point we’re discussing the mother/daughter screen locking policy. It doesn’t matter what messaging app they use, if they rely solely on Face/Touch ID, the police may force then to unlock their phone anyway.

      • Lukecis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Signal should check out as safe and private, considering even after getting multiple warrants from various governments they’ve given up next to no data on any of said requests- because they dont store it, the only thing they had is ‘time of account creation, time of last connected to service’.

    • PineapplePartisan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      E2E only protects data in transit. Unless the pair also encrypted their data at rest, their messages will still be easily accessed in plain text by their cloud backup.

      • AProfessional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It supports encrypted backups. Plus that adds legal complication of knowing to and getting data from Google/Apple/etc.