- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- fediverse@lemmy.world
Good to see that most of the instances have caught up
LW announced they are planning to migrate in the coming weeks: !lemmyworld@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
What’s LW’s reason for staying on 18.5? Is it client compatibility? Not looking to grab pitchforks, genuinely curious.
Edit: Nvm, from https://lemmy.ml/post/11122503:
We do not have a hard date set for when we will be upgrading as of yet, as we have about 7 associated task items that go along with this upgrade for things we need to double-check and confirm there will be no breakage.
Wish they would go into more detail, but ya
Yea it’s one of those awkward things I suppose, where the instance (.world) is big enough that its operational concerns are kinda at odds with where lemmy as a project is up to.
With that many users, who also kinda expect a more reddit-style experience AFAICT, a certain amount of professionalism, stability and, in effect, slowness, is expected. And that’s great.
But meanwhile lemmy is a small essentially underfunded project doing its best with a small group (2 main and a few voluntary on the side), which means bugs and then bug fixes and tweaking until things work … all of which works well over a distributed array of smaller instances so that no single node is a major let alone fatal point of failure.
And so we’ve got this situation now where you could be critical of how lemmy.world relates to the bug fixing and testing load on the lemmy-verse. lemmy.world is likely the best funded instance (last I checked their donations exceed their infra needs) and yet the job of testing and working through bugs is offloaded onto all of the other smaller instances while they wait until it’s all been ironed out. I don’t know if it’s a fair critique in the end, but it certainly seems to be there and worth considering.
Interesting point.
On the other side, as LW is more cautious about updates, that might have suggested some users to switch to instances that were more up-to-date.
But indeed I agree that people should be more spread, having 25% of Lemmy on one instance is less than ideal: https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy
I disagree about the 25% bit. Federation as a feature is overstressed. It’s very important, but it doesn’t have much of an effect on the user experience.
Federation is the freedom to get away from shitty admins and mods. Federation is the opportunity to revolt.
But you don’t need to be in a constant state of revolution. Just having the opportunity doesn’t mean you have to use it.
To each their own. Recently, the issue with lemmy.ml defederating ani.social shows that those issues are still very present today.
that might have suggested some users to switch to instances that were more up-to-date
Maybe? I’d fear instead that centralisation is pretty sticky without some massive failure and wouldn’t expect much movement in the proportion of users on lemmy.world.
Which means, if I’m onto something with my critique, there may very well be a bit of problematic dynamic there.
I’d fear instead that centralisation is pretty sticky without some massive failure and wouldn’t expect much movement in the proportion of users on lemmy.world.
It happened in August during the long DDoS attacks on LW.
I guess here it’s less prevalent because the site is still accessible, and most of the users don’t really follow closely the Lemmy versions.
I guess here it’s less prevalent because the site is still accessible, and most of the users don’t really follow closely the Lemmy versions.
Yea exactly. A DDoS is the sort of failure I’d imagine you need to shift people off. Not that big/central instances are completely bad. I think they help get people into the ecosystem that wouldn’t otherwise … and they turn out to be a pretty natural and constant phenomenon in the fediverse (mastodon.social is also about ~25% of masto) … to the point that I personally start to ask questions about alternative structures which we spoke about in another thread.
(mastodon.social is also about ~25% of masto)
Mastodon was actively pushing to be the default instance.
This criticism was co-joined with the criticism that the Mastodon organisation had set the mastodon.social as the default instance during the signup flow on the apps. While the frustrations are understandable and there are certainly valid criticisms on that decision, crypto spammers do not manually sign up via the official app, making it more of an airing of grievances than actual critique on the spam defense policy by mastodon.social.
https://fediversereport.com/defederation/
Lemmy’s community seems to be aware of the issue, and hopefully it will resolve over time.
Mastodons community is also very much aware of the issue. There are some who even call for defederstion from large instances. The main impetus being mastodons people’s concern for safety and moderation, where big instances necessarily allow much more to pass through. So while there’s more of a push from the top to make mastodon.social the flagship, from the grassroots there’s very much a push against it (I’m loosely a voice in that might self).
Lemmy.world’s push to be a big vanilla instance is not much different from what’s happening over at mastodon I’d say not least because it’s run by people running one of the big mastodon instances.
In the end I’m not sure the two spaces differ that much in their dynamics around this, notwithstanding the differences in the attitudes of the lead devs, especially given that the same result has occurred. Which is why I say it’s likely a natural phenomenon. You’ll found the distribution of instance sizes likely follows a power law which is common in nature.
I thought they were holding off because of the Federation issues from 0.19.0 (or was it 0.19.1?)
19.0 and 19.1 mostly, 19.2 fixed the issues.
19.0 and 19.1 mostly, 19.2 fixed the issues.
The leading zeros aren’t decorative. Don’t just drop them.
In this context it’s just faster to type, and not really ambiguous.
In this context it’s just faster to type
If saving six characters is so crucial, type “.0”, “.1”, and “.2”. Massive productivity boost.
You could also drop the “.” in this case, saving another three.
You could also drop the “.” in this case, saving another three.
Even better: drop the number.
