religiondispatches.org? Is this a reputable news organization?
They appear to be https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_Dispatches
Good deal. I’ve never heard of them before.
I don’t think so. Looks like some sort of blog that people can submit stuff to, with absolutely no disclosure about the owners. One of the stories is about aliens & meditation…
The author writes for Die Zeit and Tagesspiegel. Some of the most respected newspapers in Germany.
This post was originally reported and removed as a poor source.
On further review, I’m restoring it:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_Dispatches
“RD has won three Religion Newswriters Association (RNA) awards for Excellence in Religion Commentary and Analysis, a Wilbur Award for outstanding work by secular communicators on religion, and a Science for Religion Writers award from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).[4][5][6][7] The website was also recognized as an official Nominee for Webby Awards in the Religion & Spirituality category for the 2011, 2012, 2014 and 2015 Webby Awards, and as an official Honoree for Best Editorial Writing in 2016 and 2017.[8][9]”
meaty bits that i need emphasis:
Critics of such measures in both countries claim that the will of the people supersedes everything, even if the result would elevate a candidate to a position of power that would enable them to destroy democratic structures from within—and do so using taxpayer money. However, both the US and the German constitutions have tools to protect themselves and their countries in such instances—by banning candidates who qualify as enemies to the democratic system from the ballot.
followed with this:
Those who had abolished the rule of law and democracy had come to power legally and through democratic processes. A logical conclusion from this was that the laws and constitution of the Weimar Republic had not sufficiently protected democracy and the rule of law. To counter this, a number of protective mechanisms were written into the Basic Law of the Federal Republic. One of these is the possibility of banning political parties.
I also like that they brought up Popper and intolerance and tolerance.
Great article.
the world is in decline and people want a strong man. i don’t see why we don’t give them one in the form a progressive. why can’t the good guys wield an iron fist too? the problem has always been that good people are weak pacifists.
I think there is more to this. Far-Right (at least in Germany) goes along with more of a populistic communication. In my opinion the far-right promises easy solution to seemingly easy problems. But in the real world the problems are difficult and complex. There are few easy solutions and many nuances. But nuances are much more unsexy than populism. Also democracy in my opinion thrives from discourse and spreading the power. Not one person in command. But of course that’s more difficult for society to grasp than one single voice.
I agree with your sentiment, and here’s why I think it hasn’t yet happened - a strong progressive leader wouldn’t be beholden to the types of bribery and corruption commonly used to control political figures. So, the corporate media (primary benefactors of the bribe money via advertising dollars), never platforms emerging progressive candidates. One, because they don’t have unlimited PAC money to spend on ads, and two, because they’re afraid the progressive would overturn the apple cart and change the system which presently benefits them tremendously.
Just imagine how easily a strong progressive could get elected if given 24/7 free media coverage like Trump gets! They won’t get that though, so I think the answer is to organize - we have to choose the right candidate to win, and rally around them years in advance of an upcoming election to get enough grassroots momentum and fundraising in place to break through. No small task, but I’m hopeful this will happen in the next couple of election cycles due to the growing discontent as more people realize just how badly we’ve been screwed and lied to by the establishment.
i certainly think that is one of many effective tools that should be in our progressive toolbox.
If VI Lenin was alive I’d write him in. Especially since Stalin isn’t, so he can’t repeat his worst mistake.
I think it’s because the progressives don’t have a unified front. It’s hard to sell a potential “better tomorrow”. It’s a lot easier to get upset about things that are happening right now. That seems to be the essence of the conservative platform.
