• Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Actually I’m unsure the EU would allow the UK to rejoin without hefty consequences. It would set a bad precedent.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’m not so sure. The UK was a big contributor to the EU, not just monetarily, but it also gave the EU more soft power.

          It was only Germany that contributed more, and in fairness, Germany also benefits more from the EU as well, although much of that is purely that Germany already had a healthy industrial sector, a central Europe location, and better transport links to other EU nations.

          The UK and EU both lost out due to Brexit. And to think it all happened because of a stupid political gamble by Cameron. Infuriating.

          And besides, I think it’d set a good precedent for the EU - look, even a country as wealthy and well-connected as the UK left then decided it was a terrible idea. Clearly it must be good to be in the EU! That’s one hell of a boast.

          That said, geopolitics is geopolitics. Various countries would be trying to carve out any little advantage they can get.

        • Pringles@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You absolutely would, but not on the same terms as before. Those special privileges Thatcher negotiated are gone forever.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      The same EU that wanted to force backdoors and spyware on all devices by LAW. Luckily it didnt go true.

  • anlumo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    How much would that be for a middle class person in relation? $10?

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This isn’t the only fine though. It’s one of several they’ve been hit by in recent years and more might be coming. They are also getting bigger over time.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s not like the EU will just give up after one fine.

        As an economic union they have a lot of power in cases like this.

        They could ban them entirely if they wanted.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Is Apple making over €500m in profit in the EU specifically as a result of anticompetitive practices involving music?

      I’m all for punishing white collar crime severely, but the goal for the EU seems to be to set the fines so they’re not especially punitive, but still high enough that the offender would have saved money by just playing by the rules. That’s a damn sight better than what we usually get in the US.

      • Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I am also wondering where that amount comes from. Though I do not think it should be based on profit. A company can also be unprofitable on purpose in a region in order to destroy the competition an gain market share. Then after conquering the market they increase the prices again.

        In this case I suppose it also be difficult to quantify the fine. Of course the duration of the anti-competitive behaviour should also be taken into consideration and apples low willingness to better itself. Is there any article explaining the 500m euro?