I’m sure as hell I’d want to choose between surgeons. For example, I’d easily choose the one not trafficking organs.
I’m sure as hell I’d want to choose between surgeons. For example, I’d easily choose the one not trafficking organs.
You seem quite competent in researching from Wikipedia. Could you point me to the part of the article mentioning how fascism is related to women feminist presidents with a PhD, democratically and legtimately elected with a remarkable progressive agenda?
What is fascist about the current government? Oh, you are just plainly lying.
There are plenty of lawyers prepared to be judges in Mexico, competition and diplomas are gonna be a part of the process. Corrupt judges do have titles and diplomas after all. The democratic element is to complete a pre-selection made by the Congress, the Executive and the Judicial powers, at least for magistrates and the Supreme Court.
Come on! Let us be!
The very same reaction to the amend shows how urgent it is to to change the judicial system. I’m glad this was done and I can’t wait to vote corrupt judges out of office.
Not for me. I think it has to do with the type of journalism I am accustomed to read, maybe. Then there is the issue of the website where this comes from, I don’t know who they aim to as their readers. It’s possible that it is focused on reporting about famous people or “stars” as they call them, and in this case, it’s totally fine. I appreciate your point of view, though.
Oh, and yes, I agree the guy said horrible things to Swift. That’s not a discussion for me. Where those words came from is important for me to know, and that bit of information would have been appreciated.
I find the title unnecessarily “clickbaity”, and this is what I think is unfair for readers and for the very same news reported.
EDIT: For example, I would prefer that instead of including “Elon Musk sets his sights on Taylor Swift”, they would have put something like “after Taylor endorsed Harris as a Childless Cat Owner”.
Yes, that exactly. The way she signed the endorsement and its relation to the Republican candidate. Still, the things he said are very disturbing and menacing, coming from the richest person in the world.
There is a context to what was said that is not fairly put in the title of the article, but this is still fucking creepy, misogynistic, ultimately unacceptable behavior.
Amazing little furr. Hang in there, partner.
What about the need to tell others how to and what to discuss in their free time with their social circle? Can I do that?
“Large parts of Russia”? Oh, well…
I just love this kind of personal recommendation instead of the same shit Spotify and every streaming/scrobbling service keeps recommending. Sure I will, thank you.
No, I just find it strange coming this from him. Call it a collateral topic, these things happen in a discussion.
Just put it in mono. Now, how can I fix this infamous autotune trend?
Didn’t he say that using adblockers in YouTube was basically piracy?
Americans need to analyze their views surrounding guns. And take their time. It’s mind-blowing to try to make them understand guns are risky, regardless of handling, trigger discipline, or any other bullshit they tell themselves. The mere existence of guns is dangerous, the bigger the number of guns out there is the amount of accidents, shootings and massacres waiting to happen out there.
Edit: yeah, pushed some buttons here. Good.
It kind of is, actually. Maybe not more than his charisma, good heart and endeavors in conservation, but is an important part of why. I mean, this is a meme and he is doing exactly that. But you know what? Whatever you say is perfect. I really don’t want to do this again.
The misogynist is her, you say, while you can’t even accept she can think at all by herself.