Why do some languages use gendered nouns? It seems to just add more complexity for no benefit.

  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because languages aren’t constructed, they ‘evolved’ naturally from humans communicating with one another for many generations. As such, they aren’t intended to be as simple as possible. They aren’t intended in the first place. They’ve grown over time with no regard for whether the rules makes sense because nobody designed those rules, they just happened.

    • TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Okay, thank you. Anyway: is here somebody who actually knows WHY this happened? What was the underlying cause for our ansestors to start using it? What were they trying to achieve or solve? (UNINTENTIONALLY, okay, we got it.)

      • Æsc@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        We don’t have a lot of records of what speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language were thinking because they lived c. 4500-2500 BC and didn’t have their own writing. I think the for the earliest writing we have of an Indo-European language gendered nouns had already been invented.

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can say that having gendered nouns does add a little bit more information to communication. Like if we are talking about a man and a woman and we’re using pronouns, then “he spoke to her” is unambiguous as to who is doing what. Likewise, if all nouns have a gender, you encounter more situations where the gender adds some extra context and leads to marginally less ambiguity. So if you’re at a bakery and there are two adjacent items behind the counter, one with masculine gender and one with feminine gender, and you point and say “can I have her please”, there is no need for the baker to ask if you mean this one or that one, they know based on gender.

        Not saying this makes gender “worth it”, but in an emergent system, small things like this might have given it enough of a foothold to exist.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Being able to communicate complex concepts made it easier for them to work together. Once the hominids became apex predators, their main adversaries were other hominids. Again, in that case, the better you can communicate, the better your chances for survival are.

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          These bits of grammar don’t always actually communicate any extra information about anything other than the grammar of the language you’re speaking, though. The “gender” of the thing in question can’t reliably be distinguished from grammar since even in the Indo-European languages where the noun classes are typically thought of as masculine or feminine, the word’s grammatical gender can contradict its actual gender. The Old English word for “woman”, back when English had grammatical gender, was masculine.