• BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I believe USB-C is the only connector supported for carrying DisplayPort signals other than DisplayPort itself.

    The biggest issue with USB-C for display in my opinion is that cable specs vary so much. A cable with a type c end could carry anywhere from 60-10000MB/s and deliver anywhere from 5-240W. What’s worse is that most aren’t labeled, so even if you know what spec you need you’re going to have a hell of a time finding it in a pile of identical black cables.

    Not that I dislike USB-C. It’s a great connector, but the branding of USB has always been a mess.

    • jaxxed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think that the biggest issue with dp over usbc is that people are going to try to use the same cable for 4k and large data transfers at the same time, and will then whine about weird behaviour.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yep, very true. I didn’t understand this until I couldn’t connect my Mac to my screen via the USB C given with the computer, I had to buy another (and order it in specifically). Pick up a cable, and I have no idea which version it is.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Dont forget the limited length. I cant remember exactly but usb c delivering power has a max length of arpund 4 metres

    • Freestylesno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is the big issue I have with with “USB C”. USB c is just the connector which can be used for so many things. What actual is supported depends on things you can’t see, like the cable construction or what the device supports.