smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 个月前The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1732arrow-down110
arrow-up1722arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 个月前message-square87fedilink
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up105arrow-down1·10 个月前We cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up109arrow-down3·edit-210 个月前There are now three competing standards. https://xkcd.com/927/
minus-squarebaropithecus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35arrow-down2·10 个月前I know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
minus-squareThunderbird4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-210 个月前I’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
minus-squareTattorack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·10 个月前Yes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
We cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
There are now three competing standards.
https://xkcd.com/927/
I know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
Oh? Let me CEC on that…
I’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
Yes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
Hi, my name is USB-C!