smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1732arrow-down110
arrow-up1722arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up105arrow-down1·9 months agoWe cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up109arrow-down3·edit-29 months agoThere are now three competing standards. https://xkcd.com/927/
minus-squarebaropithecus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35arrow-down2·9 months agoI know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
minus-squareThunderbird4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-29 months agoI’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
minus-squareTattorack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·9 months agoYes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
We cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
There are now three competing standards.
https://xkcd.com/927/
I know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
Oh? Let me CEC on that…
I’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
Yes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
Hi, my name is USB-C!