• vd1n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t know how I feel about that. They both deserve to be treated like cartel criminals. NOTHING LESS.

    You gotta realize criminals and street life is the same as the mainstream. Please trust me.

    • ColonelSanders@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. Rationalizing one as being the ‘lesser evil’ is basically just shifting the Overton window. Both are evil. Both deserve to lose. If they can make each other lose that would be ideal but if only one wins, we all still lose.

      • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s odd to me people think Elon is more evil anyway. He’s definitely louder and stupider but way less responsible for tearing apart the fabric of our society. And some of his projects have been a net positive.

        They should both lose to death but if we’re gonna make the comparison, Zuckbot is hands down more evil.

        That being said, it will still be hilarious if zucc beats the shit out of Elongated Muskrat.

        • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed, I may have more of a gut level disdain for Elon, but Zucc is clearly way worse because of the way Facebook’s algorithms have harmed society.

          • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s cause Elon’s a fucking troll on top of being a douchebag. At least Zuck has the decency to try to hide it.

        • vd1n@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          True true! Zuck was a catalyst for social media, and Elon for abused tech/science. I knew Elon was a joke the minute he talked about putting a car in space, just to test something, but back then I just got hated by reddit. It sucks that the world and space programs didn’t come after him for that.

    • graphite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You gotta realize criminals and street life is the same as the mainstream. Please trust me.

      lmfao

  • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the correct answer is “fuck both of them”. You don’t need Twitter, you definitely don’t need Threads.

    You don’t even need Mastodon for that matter. You don’t need a constant drip feed of dopamine. If you need to stay informed, you can just use news sites or something.

      • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        hmm, that’s a fair point. I have heard things about independent journalists making use of platforms like Twitter and Tiktok. I wonder if independent journalists have begun to adopt Mastodon as well, or just decentralized social networks in general, to share their news.

        • nutomic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You can’t make real journalism in a few hundred characters or in a 10 sec video. But there are lots of bloggers with their own websites.

          • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Meh, they just end up making it a series of posts / videos. If someone’s risking their life by doing shit like going into an active warzone and using social media to keep the public informed of what’s going on, doesn’t that probably count as “real” journalism, regardless of what online platform they upload to?

          • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Meh, they just end up making it a series of posts / videos. If someone’s risking their life by doing shit like going into an active warzone and using social media to keep the public informed of what’s going on, doesn’t that probably count as “real” journalism, regardless of what online platform they upload to?

      • complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        hmm, that’s a fair point. I have heard things about independent journalists making use of platforms like Twitter and Tiktok. I wonder if independent journalists have begun to adopt Mastodon as well, or just decentralized social networks in general, to share their news.

    • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Content creators need them though, specially artists.

      Tons of artists, specially japanese, are actually moving to mastodon and misskey right now, which is a great sign.

    • sake@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are situations where lesser evil is the best available choice, but this isn’t one of them.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you not know what analogies or metaphors are? Like, you do know that the person you replied to wasn’t comparing either of these men to Hitler or Himmler, right?

        • graphite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The usage of the analogy by definition implies a comparison of some kind.

          Otherwise, wny use it?

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To exaggerate and make a point? To rile people up and ruffle some feathers? The comparison isn’t between the two of them and the two Nazis, the comparison is between the two of them.

            • graphite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No no no, those are valid, sure, but they wouldn’t be possible without that initial comparison.

              The comparison isn’t between the two of them and the two Nazis, the comparison is between the two of them.

              There’s the implication that they’re both “evil” or “bad figures”, which is the entire point. The analogy itself wouldn’t be that great otherwise

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah, the implication is that their bad or evil, but I don’t really see it as comparing them to the Nazis. They just exaggerated for effect and used the most extreme example of “evil” they could think of to make a point.

                At least that how it seemed to me.

  • Logical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s definitely not worth it. Zuckerberg is the bigger fish here, at least within the social media domain. Meta’s threads replacing Twitter would make them even more powerful than they already are. I don’t like Elon, and it’s crazy that he somehow managed to make Twitter even worse than it was, but we really don’t need Meta to grow even larger.

    • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, if we were still talking about the cage match of be fine watching that weird meat puppet beat musk up, but for social media I think we loose either way.

  • krimsonbun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want them both to lose. Twitter dying would be in some ways, a victory for the people. But giving zucky more control over people’s lives is a horrible idea, especially when you take into account meta’s past. But we don’t have much say in what happens there, so we gotta learn to fight back.

    Threads is banned in Europe which will probably leave a lot of people sad, if you ask me that’s the perfect opportunity to advertise mastodon and other fediverse projects to your friends, family, etc. Talk about it on bigger platforms if you still have an account on them, engage with posts and videos about the fediverse and how to use it so we can get them into the algorithm. Every little bit helps, we can do this.

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trading one asshole billionaire for another is a losing game. The only losers are users of these services.

    It’s like two giant Mecha robots fighting while a crowd of fans of one or the other are cheering on the ground and being squished.

  • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    So here’s what we do: we let Threads kill Twitter. Then, when Twitter is dead, we kill Threads.

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the fight against one evil should we really join another evil to do that

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would agree, I’m just pointing out the logical flaw.

        In fact I’d argue Zuckerberg is worse, if only because he already owns so much of the digital landscape and most people use FB to federate with other stuff.

        Elon is meme’d as being the big bad here but in reality he’s running his first website/social media company against a guy who essentially developed the modern model and already owns another massive SM site as well as his new Twitter clone experiment in addition to the foundational website he still possesses.

  • graphite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Elon is fine in comparison; he’s far less of a problem than Meta is.

    The platform at this point may as well already be doomed because of people like you.

    Really - it’s like I’m reading the posts of Reddit manchildren who will forever retain their virginity because they’re incapable of understanding how things actually get done.

    I guess you can’t expect much these days.

    What’s going to happen next? Meta dominates the platform, you and the rest of your kind “protest”, then you fuck off somewhere else and pretend you “won”, while sucking each other off only for a repeat to happen sometime later?

    Are you going to wear your fedoras?

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really don’t get the recent Elon hate. He has always done some shitty things, like labour issues and I have always called that on.

      But free speech is a good ideal and it just screams of sjw controlling the narrative. That’s not a good thing, the hate is unjustified lately.