"There is no way they could have been considered combatants," said one writer and analyst. "This is unreal."

Adding to the mountain of evidence that Israel is engaged in a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip, Al Jazeera on Thursday aired footage of what the news outlet reported was an Israeli drone targeting four Palestinians in Khan Younis last month.

Those killed by the unmanned aerial vehicle in the rubble of the southern Gaza city appear to be unarmed teenagers or young men. According to a translation of the coverage, they were not identified in the reporting.

Tariq Kenney-Shawa, Al-Shabaka’s U.S. policy fellow, said: “This is among the worst footage I’ve seen. Not only were these boys clearly unarmed and present no threat whatsoever, but they were struck multiple times even after stumbling/crawling away. There is no way they could have been considered combatants. This is unreal.”

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    21·
    8 months ago

    What you are saying is just not true.

    You can’t go and kill unarmed, non combative, un-uniformed people however you’d like.

    You do need to prove that the people you are killing are actually combatants. Especially when you send a missile down someone’s head just walking on the street.

    • TheControlled@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      8 months ago

      You’re right, you can’t do that.

      Also you’re wrong, you don’t need to prove that. At least not publicly which is what you seem to be implying. Intelligence has to prove that these people, or some of them, are Hamas, likely of some significance, maybe not. Then they have to be identified, monitored, and tracked for a strike opportunity. Then, when the entire chain of command is in agreement that that’s their guy and this is the best time, they attack.

      In your version, the drone operator seems to have infinite ammo and gleeful fire-at-will orders. Killing anyone who is “just walking down the street.” Maybe the soldiers on the ground operate that way, but not drones or jets.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        1·
        8 months ago

        “In your version, the drone operator seems to have infinite ammo and gleeful fire-at-will orders. Killing anyone who is “just walking down the street.” Maybe the soldiers on the ground operate that way, but not drones or jets.”

        Where are you getting this story from? I sure as hell didn’t even come close to mention or talk about anything of the sort.

        And regarding your statement

        “Intelligence has to prove that these people, or some of them, are Hamas, likely of some significance, maybe not. Then they have to be identified, monitored, and tracked for a strike opportunity. Then, when the entire chain of command is in agreement that that’s their guy and this is the best time, they attack.”

        Do you have any source for that being the way they operate at every single strike. Any source that this is how it went down from what we saw? Or are you just guessing?

        My money is on the later.

        • Prandom_returns@lemm.eeEnglish
          11·
          8 months ago

          Because of this sentence:

          What you are saying is just not true.

          It’s absolutely true. We don’t know if IDF is collecting proof or not. And IDF absolutely does not need to provide proof to the public. Only to the people who are investigating the war. (Just like the person you are replying to stated)

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            2·
            8 months ago

            “Neither IDF or Hammas has to provide proof of anything to anybody for any reason except when propagandantistic PR is at play”

            That is simply not true. They do have to provide proof to somebody. You said so yourself. To the ones investigating. I can assure you. They are definatly included in these “anybody”