TL;DR

  • The European Council has ended its adoption procedure for rules related to phones with replaceable batteries.
  • By 2027, all phones released in the EU must have a battery the user can easily replace with no tools or expertise.
  • The regulation intends to introduce a circular economy for batteries.
  • 0421008445828ceb46f496700a5fa6@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully this doesn’t go the way of charging cables and we have a different battery shape for every phone… Otherwise a 2040 regulation will be to standardize battery shape(s)

    • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well battery shapes will be custom, but the regulation does include demand to offer said batteries as spare parts.

      shall ensure that those batteries are available as spare parts of the equipment that they power for a minimum of five years after placing the last unit of the equipment model on the market, with a reasonable and non-discriminatory price for independent professionals and end-users.

      This being EU, EU will actually even police that reasonability clause via consumer protection agencies. You might not like the still probably pretty hefty price, but outright monopoly price gouging will not be allowed. Atleast not with in EU jurisdiction. Also makers will tend to gravitate to number of pretty standard battery sizes and geometries. Simply out of economies of scale. If you have to offer the batteries available as spares. You don’t want to offer 150 different battery models on you warehousing and supply to your retail stores. You want as few as possible. Maybe say 5 different sizes or maybe couple ten different kinds on the biggest makers with the largest product range. Cheaper to buy more of similar batteries from battery supplier, than have custom module developed for each new phone model. Well unless one is apple and only has couple new models per year. They probably will have now just little bit different optimized shape battery for each models, but they also have the scale per model to make sense for that.

      also:

      Software shall not be used to impede the replacement of a portable battery or LMT battery, or of their key components, with another compatible battery or key components.

      Meaning companies can’t use software locks to deny third party batteries. Since the language says compatible battery, not replacement battery. Which wouldn’t make sense anyway, since replacement battery would be the one the OEM offers. Ofcourse I’m sure there will be lot of hurdur by makers over “don’t use third party batteries, those aren’t as safe” and “well but that isn’t compatible”. However as one remembers during the early 2000’s and upto mid 2010’s there was a very healthy both OEM and third party replacement battery market. As with that experience, yes shoddy batteries from non-reputable people can be problem. However in this basic consumer electronic safety regulation (aka you can’t just shovel anything to the market with utterly nuts unsafe circuitry in the first place) and the market itself handles it. Again it will be found out over little time, which makers are the reputable ones with the good batteries with all the proper safeties and good production quality. Reputable big chain electronics dealers then focus on only offering the established reputable third party batteries and parts out of their own reputation (You sold me a shoddy battery. It burst and ruined my phone. I’m never buying from this phone store ever again). Plus same with the actual makers with stuff like offering extensive warranties, warranting the replacement of the device, if their battery messes it up and so on.

      This is all “we have already been here” ground except instead of the T9 numpad on the phone front, there is now a whole front covering touch screen on it’s place.

  • Reclipse@lemdro.idOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    The headline says it’s official. But then the article mentions -

    Now, the only step left is for the European Council and Parliament to sign on the dotted line.

    So it’s not official?? Can anyone explain please??

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is a special day when there is happy tech news. This is a day for celebration. Having done my own battery replacements some have been a nightmare to do with all the glue and hoping the screen doesn’t break. I look forward to this, since with rise of phone costs I don’t intend to update frequently. I’d actually change my battery annually if it wasn’t such a hassle.

  • troplin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don‘t know how to feel about this. While It’s nice to be able to replace the battery, I very much prefer the durability of todays phones over those flimsy removable back plates that used to be common in the 00s.

    I really hope they mean that no special tools/skill are required. They should just standardize one type of micro screwdriver that everyone has to use.

    Replaceable batteries inevitably also have to be sturdier s.t. they don‘t pose a fire hazard, making the entire phone bulkier or reducing battery life.

    My iPhone XR is now over 4 years old and battery capacity is still at 80%, getting me through the day easily.
    Before that I had an iPhone 4s where I replaced the battery after ~6 years. I was really disappointed with the new battery and ended up buying a new phone anyway after a few weeks.

    My phone is the device that I use the most by a huge margin. It doesn‘t bother me too much if I have to replace it every 5-6 years. And I‘m pretty environmetally conscious in general.

    • ayyndrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get what you’re saying, but removable batteries and flimsy plastic backs don’t have to go hand in hand. The LG V20 had a metal back and a removable battery

    • moitoi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Galaxy Xcover pro has a good durability, is IP68 and has a removable battery. It’s a matter of willingness.

    • Jerusalem Spider-Man@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gee, I can’t understand how my lgg3 is still in one piece, what with that replaceable battery making it so flimsy.

      It’s almost as if I’m imagining it being able to turn on because it fell apart when I sat it on the table three years ago.

      Good thing it broke back then! Otherwise, I might have spent tens of dollars on replacement batteries each year!

      Not to mention all the tablets that broke because they were flimsy with replaceable batteries. The galaxytab 2 and 3 alone would have blown up from materials fatigue if I’d replaced those batteries over the years. Whew, what a relief I don’t have to have them in use as digital picture frames like I would have otherwise.

    • Skiptrace@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My Galaxy S5 never felt flimsy. It was even highly waterproof for the time because it had a COVER for the USB Port attached to the phone! It even had a gasp HEADPHONE JACK!

      • Elcapitan786@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also looked and felt cheap. HTC did the best solution but back was metal so no wireless charging. I would prefer a back cover like the nexus 5 or lg g4

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t know the USB port had a cover. I bought mine used but excellent condition, apparently other than the port cover. My S5 had a brief dip in a river and never charged again. :(

    • Hogger85b@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of my last three phones battery has not been the issue I disposed. Mostly it is they grind to halt software wise as they fail to cope with newer apps expectations for storage or ram, I change my phone every 3 to 4 years.

    • electriccars@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Give me a phone with a removable battery in the style of the HTC Sensation 4G. Sexy, metal, easy to open and swap the battery. It was an incredible device that I remember using fondly.

    • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well some GDPR implementations did make it across the pond for the sake of simplicity so I imagine this might go the same way.

      • adriaan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the case of GDPR it is not just for simplicity. It’s because companies that operate in the EU need to provide those protections to all EU citizens, even those across the pond. You cannot check if someone is an EU citizen so if you operate in the EU you effectively need to treat everyone like an EU citizen.

    • darkduck77@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really as a design change as drastic as user exchangeable batteries means phone companies would probably rather adopt a unified design (removable batteries) than a region based design

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      2027 is actually pretty early for such a dramatic change, and somewhere I heard that it’s all phones sold, if that’s the case (i.e. you can’t sell old models if they don’t have easily replaceable batteries) than that is a really early date for such a law.

  • esty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    if this makes batteries smaller so be it

    let’s go back to 2012 and carry a few of them at a time

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no need. Battery tech has advanced substantially. There is no reason phones shouldn’t last all day and then some, then when the battery becomes shitty, replace it instead of massive e-waste. We’re lucky the EU exist.

  • Gabadabs@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not getting my hopes up, but I’d like to see this influence the smartphones being sold in the US as well. One of the primary things that keeps me replacing my smartphones is battery life, so being able to replace the battery would be incredible.

    • Sheltac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the EU is such a massive market, EU law tends to bleed out. It’s expensive to keep different SKUs for different regions, so compliance tends to seep out.

      I’d expect at least some of this to have an impact outside the EU.

      • sunbunman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        And they know people are going to be importing these smartphones once it goes live and it’s not a battle that can be fought.

        • alectrem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The company Fairphone makes almost perfectly repairable smartphones, but they’re only for the European market and the radios won’t really work in the US. I think it would be a similar case for a lot of phones so it might not actually be super viable to import phones in the future either, unfortunately.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also means that other places can introduce similar laws with less friction. Like the GDPR and the various American privacy-oriented laws.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my Android experience if you have an unpopular/old phone, years later many of the new batteries you buy aren’t much good. That or the radio frequencies change and you need a new phone for that. But still 4-5 years on a phone should be doable.

    • dub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember smartphone days of old when you could buy additional battery packs, extended ones and huge lemon ones or something that would give you like 10,000 milliamp hours. Good times!

  • evo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    One thing I haven’t seen mentioned is that this will inevitably make batteries smaller.

    If you are supposed to be able to open the phone and remove the battery manufacturers need to design a way to remove the cover, shield other components, create a compartment for the battery, and use sturdier batteries. All of those things take us space. Manufacturers aren’t just going to make phones thicker so that physical space has to be eaten by something… and it’s going to be the battery.

    I really liked having a removable battery on my phone 10 years ago in case I had a particularly long/intensive day. But now that I make it through a day without worry this could actually be sorta annoying.