• fiercekitten@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    Parts pairing is prohibited only on devices sold in 2025 and later. And there are carve-outs for certain kinds of electronics and devices, including video game consoles, medical devices, HVAC systems, motor vehicles, and—as with other states—“electric toothbrushes.”

    What’s a good-faith argument for exempting these devices? Or was it simply successful lobbying in protecting corporate interests.

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could see an argument about medical devices, HVAC, and vehicles… But I don’t think I’d agree with them. Except maybe medical.

      Consoles and toothbrushes though? What the fuck?

      • Melt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess console because they want the whole thing intact to enforce DRM?

      • oo1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        For toothbrushes, are they worried repair won’t re-seal it effectively so make it unsuitable for use in the wet environment?

        • liara@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hope you’re right and this isn’t about them getting ready to DRM brush handles to brush heads. Sonicare brush heads are ridiculously overpriced compared to the knock offs

        • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, I don’t want the thing supplying the air I’m breathing to accidentally not burn all the gas and lead to carbon monoxide poisoning etc… Things like the ductwork and shit, for sure, but not like, a burner.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you want to be stuck with the same thermostat forever? Imagine it comes with one of those Amazon ones with a persistent camera and microphone in it that you can’t opt out of.

            • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              A thermostat doesn’t have refrigerants/gasses in them. It’s nothing more than a complicated on off switch

            • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Firstly, I said this one was iffy to me.

              Second, the subtopic was HVAC and thermostats are like, the electronics that control the HVAC which I wouldn’t even really necessarily bucket into HVAC. It’s like HVAC adjacent.

              Third, this whole topic is about right to repair, not right to replace. So the on topic argument is “you want to be able to repair the same thermostat with off brand parts”, to which I say, yes? Probably? I don’t see how that’s a problem.

              And fourth, who the fuck would buy an Amazon thermostat, lmao.

                • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s more “device” pairing than “parts” pairing. The thermostat to HVAC communication is a standard. Sure, if someone started forcing that, that’d be bad. But that’s more akin to Apple’s “iOS only works with MacBooks” type shit with Airdrop and such than it is to their “you can’t replace the camera in your phone unless it’s from us”. They’re both problems, but the one you’re describing is both not happening and a different issue. I’m not saying it won’t happen but it’s a different topic.

        • Fosheze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You need some sort of licensing to do most HVAC work anyways. Theres no point in forcing companies to make all the parts available to the average joe when the average joe can’t legally do the work anyways.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The goal of the bill was to get something with teeth passed. Fighting every lobby at once would be impossible, so they leave those devices out of it and will now be able to work on different laws for those things. At least that’s what I read they’re doing for the John Deere stuff at least. The legislators know it’s going to be a difficult battle, so they segmented the law to make it so that a failure in one spot wouldn’t cause a loss everywhere.