• bitfucker@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    My bad, I worded that badly. What I meant is that the website now has access to those features via the browser (js or some other mechanism). Now suddenly fingerprinting a device can be made easier.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s a valid concern, but according to the article all the website can access is the random public key, or the fact that the feature is unsupported in this browser (for an unspecified reason).

      • bitfucker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve also read the article. I am just being cautious on how it can be used for other things that cause privacy concern. And so far, I’ve come up blank too.