• Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pass. Qwant has had its share of controversies, regardless their results aren’t better than DDG.

    If Mozilla was serious about this they would run their own Searx instance and let people choose what engines they wanted to use.

    https://searx.space/

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Certainly some things are rate limited, Brave and Startpage are particularly bad for this. I omit them from my endjinns in Searx settings.

          • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, except in the case where Google is rate limited. There is/was a Searx instance that regularly got blocked by Google, I do not remember which one though.

          • Kindness@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            isn’t Startpage redundant?

            After they were purchased by an advertising company? Yes.

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I linked to is a listing of public Searx instances. You can look at the list and see things like uptime, where they are hosted, etc.

        For performance I find it much better than DDG. In the settings page you can choose which search engines you wish to use, for example Brave, Stract, and Qwant. You can also tailor results by adding things like Lemmy, F-Droid, and Anna’s Archive.