• Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    People love to repeat this, but US companies aren’t coming from a place of hostile intent like china’s special brand of tik tok for the states.

    • KrapKake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m not so sure about that, they seem pretty hostile to consumers and employees.

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it’s owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

        • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because the USA strong armed them into giving their platform handling to Oracle Corp, a top tier US govt contractor.

          But since pro-palestine cries can’t be silenced on TikTok as easily as Zio media, taking control of the platform is no longer enough

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        You say “red scare” as if China isn’t a hostile nation state to the US. Go look at western company penetration in China if you want. Are you calling it “western scare” when China blocks yet another western company? I didn’t think so.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hmm, here’s what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

      According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

      Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

      Zuck: Just ask.

      Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

      [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

      Zuck: People just submitted it.

      Zuck: I don’t know why.

      Zuck: They “trust me”

      Zuck: Dumb fucks.

      Brutal.

      Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook’s aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

      They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they’re still hostile to users.