• Chefdano3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The standard rules are no refunds for games played more than 2 hrs. The first time you ask for a refund it’s handled by an automated system. Ask for a refund again, and an actual staff member will review. So just try again.

      • mihnt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They pinged me for owning it more than two weeks, so that’s fun.

        • Krafting@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is also part of the default refund policy on steam too yeah. Less than 15 days and less than 2h of playtime.

          • mihnt@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I’m aware, I may have just done it a bit early on in this fiasco.

            Edit: “We will not be granting a refund at this time. The date of the purchase exceeds 2 weeks (our refund policy maximum).”

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They did this to me with Destiny 2 as well. Dragons Dogma II got refunded no questions asked though.

      Think playtime plays a factor, though for live-service games I honestly feel like it shouldn’t.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m with you there. If for no other reason than the fact that they’re designed to keep you playing. It’s kind of like kicking the victim.

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I guess I shouldn’t even look at what game this is since it’s not going well? Lmao

        • David_Eight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Did they? If the game is owned and published by Sony what part did Arrowhead play. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I genuinely don’t know. Like doesn’t the publisher(Sony) handle all of this?

            • David_Eight@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah I read about that later but, I’m still not clear on a few things. Did Arrowhead literally ignore that part? I assumed that there was a technical issue preventing Arrowhead from adding the PSN requirement from being added that has recently been fixed?

              Second, releasing the game in countries that don’t have access to PSN, was that done maliciously by Arrowhead as well? I also assumed the publisher would of handled the Steam listing, if not was Arrowhead attempting some sort of protest of their own trying to force Sony hand. Or is Arrowhead just incompetent lol?

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Some of the community managers have drank the coolaid, but other than that the devs seem to support the protest

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          What dev would be stupid enough to make their game more complex with multiple logins…

          I’m willing to bet that steam probably has amazing api and docs for account integration and that it’s better than PSN.

    • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sometimes we have to make sacrifices to uphold our principles.

      Not getting abused by Sony and it’s ilk Is just one of the many principles that we can uphold at minimal risk and for minimal cost.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Nah, it’s simply that the game is overrated so the devs had to do something stupid to bring everyone back down to earth.

      I mean it takes less than 20 hours of playtime before you’ve already seen everything the game has to offer. It’s a very repetitive and predictable game. For me to consider a multiplayer game worth my money, it needs to provide at least 250 hours of enjoyment minimum.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    How? I tried it now two times and didn’t get a refund with 50 hours on the clock…

    • Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Isn’t that an issue with the developers of those games? Steam is ultimately just a game library. If the book you check out of that library is only readable on Kindle that’s not on Steam lol

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nope. Purely a steam thing. Either a cloud storage problem or steam overlay availability. Ive got games that just will not run without those things. 8n fact if i try to run any of them without first starting steam, steam will auto load, or stop the game until i do it

    • padge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This used to be a problem for me but now it’s fine. I think it was a bug that Valve couldn’t be bothered to fix until the Steam Deck entered development