• slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    These companies should be forced to pay big money to each and every person affected by these breaches. Not like $120. Like $10,000 per. Teach them real lessons

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      Even $120 would be amazing. I just got an email that said too bad. I just bought a monitor cause that’s where they sold it. Idk why they have to save my info. I just want to pay for the product. If it was up to me, they would delete all my info immediately. They only need to record when the serial number was sold anyway.

      Oh if only I was European.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      In the case of this breach, I’d be happy with a $10 payout, the consequences for me are actually pretty low here. That being said, I think we’d be lucky if Dell had to pay more than $0.50 per person, and that money will probably go to a lawyer’s fees, not me.

    • xep@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I know you’re being flippant, but it’s worth noting that there is a considerable difference between a company getting hacked like this and an app with unfettered access to the cluster to sensors that we’ve got in our pockets.

    • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The thing with tik tok isn’t only with the data China can gather from US residents. It’s also how they can use that information to influence the populace and send them propaganda, for example influencing the election results.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        They can also gather information about our politicians who use it and blackmail them to get what they want

        • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yep. But I guess it was already banned on government phones right? (not from the US, so I’m not all that up to date…)

      • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ok, what information could they gather and how would they use that to influence an election?

        • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The section Methods on the Cambridge Analytica wiki page explains it pretty well. While it’s not proven to be able to directly influence voting, it’s effective at swaying people’s opinions and emotions about subjects.