• Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    They have a large footprint of creation. Their footprint over their lifetime is net negative when measured against direct alternatives.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Measured against ICE cars. Actual direct alternatives are public transport, bikes, and micro cars. And you’re also assuming they’re driven that long before the person buys another car.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Those are indirect alternatives. A direct alternative serves the exact same function.

        It doesn’t matter if that person buys another car; it matter is the EV stays on the road. They do.

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          They do serve the exact same function. And no, they don’t stay on the road. The batteries degrade, die and aren’t replaceable due to proprietary designs. There’s already plenty of dead EVs.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The average life of an EV is over 13 years. The batteries, generally have 100k warranties and are consistently lasting well into the 150k mile ranges. These vehicles stay on the road for as long as an ICE automobile and have a negative carbon footprint when compared to that baseline.

            Buses, trains, trams, etc. serve a similar overall function as a personal automobile, the two even share some overlap on fundamental functions; however, as they are not 1:1 replacements for one another any comparison can never be of a direct nature.