• DogWater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    And it was a safety measure in case they lost control that would ensure it would burn itself up and not become space junk. This guy is a nut job lmao. SpaceX is badass!

    setting all politics and social issues from the CEO aside.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right but I think that was their point though no? That, for safety reasons, they didn’t make it to orbit. Seems like a pretty cut and dry “no” they didn’t make it to orbit just like that person said. And the reason was that they didn’t know if it would make it. Which kind of supports their point.

      I’m not going to claim to know enough either way (besides Elon Musk being an idiot), but they don’t seem wrong there.

      It seems like you guys are mad that it didn’t make orbit and get defensive when people point it out.

      • DogWater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Because the longer a launch goes the easier it is. Basically there are critical phases of flight and there’s the actual continuous operation of the rocket all the time. Things like clearing the tower, max q, stage separation, engine re-lighting are all insanely complex operations, but once all that’s done and all you need to do is burn the engines for longer it’s pretty easy to just burn more rocket fuel on a flight that has been working the whole time. its something that is much less risky to the mission going on. Things can go wrong, but the chance is much higher during one of those complex things.