A large number of EU resolutions on Ukraine are being blocked by Hungary, said Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis.

Hungary is digging in and refusing to wave through billions in military aid for Ukraine, prompting growing dismay among other EU countries.

"I have to calm myself [when] I talk about this issue, because it’s getting really ridiculous now,” a senior EU diplomat said of the standoff with Hungary, speaking before Monday’s meeting of EU foreign ministers. “What’s happening is outrageous.”

Diplomats had hoped to have a new €6.6 billion package ready ahead of this week’s meetings of foreign and defense ministers in Brussels. The deal included €860 million for arms procurement, reported by POLITICO last week.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    their neighbours wouldn’t have had the motivation to join NATO

    Joining NATO is not a defensive move, every single war its fought has been offensive in nature, and to quote Anthony Blinken “You’re either at the table or you’re on the menu”

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Go hit the bottle again. It absolutely is a defensive move. Them and other countries near Russia were happy not being in NATO until Putin started attacking neighbors… He’s made it clear he wants to restore the USSR and its power…

      Ukraine’s mistake was not moving faster/sooner to join NATO…

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      “every single war it’s faught”

      So that would be Afghanistan.

      The Balkans were just generally on fire in the 90s and NATO enforced a no fly zone and sent peacekeeper forces after the fact.

      There’s a few more peacekeeping missions and no-fly zones (Lybia for example), then some training missions, some humanitarian missions (Pakistan for example), a few air campaigns against non-state entities (“terrorists” but realistically that’s often just a matter of perspective), and a bunch of anti-piracy actions.

      So it’s “every single war” with heavy emphasis on single.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        4 months ago

        Peacekeeping? Libya had the highest HDI of Africa before NATO’s “peace keeping”. But it’s hard to separate the blame of NATO and just America for arming the factions. Same with the balkins.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Libya had the highest HDI of Africa before NATO’s “peace keeping”

          Dude, at least visit Wikipedia before you argue. Lybia was an example of NATO enforcing a no-fly zone, not peacekeeping. And Lybia’s HDI was back to pre-civil war levels three years ago (ie the 2021 data matches the 2013 data).

          Are you going to pretend that Muammer Gaddafi was a benevolent and beloved dictator, and that there’s no way Lybians would want him to fuck off all of their own?

          it’s hard to separate the blame of NATO and just America

          No it fucking isn’t. NATO lists all actions they’ve taken part of on their website. If the action is there, it was NATO, if it isn’t, it was not a NATO action.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Strange, and which countries did NATO invade then?

      Because the only case NATO was called was after 9/11, but since it was about invading an other country all of it was voluntary. So the majority didn’t even participate.