… and I can’t even continue the chat from my phone.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Signal’s desktop app is as horrendously unusably bad as the project as a whole is good, tbh.

    It’s no wonder people prefer stuff like Telegram. It has native apps and all. Or can be used in a browser. Meanwhile Signal is only used in a browser, but you have to download it and it fucks up font scaling and it shits the bed on font antialiasing and it can’t even get UI design consistent with the OS it’s running on and it won’t even use the OS emoji font.

    Let’s not even mention how you still cannot use Signal on a tablet.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Signal’s desktop app is as horrendously unusably bad

      I think this is a bit dramatic. I’ve been using it for years, no problems.

    • voxel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      telegram has an “advantage” of not having e2e encryption by default, which makes stuff like sync much easier as chats are fully stored on the server (encrypted with your user password).

      and if you enable encryption (aka start a secret chat), the chat will only exist on the device you started it on and stop getting synced

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      it won’t even use the OS emoji font.

      im still amused by the fact that discord mobile uses two yes, you read that correctly, TWO emojis sets, it uses one in app, and the selector, and then uses another for the text input line, because.

  • asparagapple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Signal package has Electron (which is built on top of Chromium and NodeJS) + Signal app code and assets. So not surprised that it’s bigger than Chromium.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Like I know native apps are always better, but why doesn’t electron ship an installable runtime so we don’t have to have a shitload of inert chromium installs on one machine?

    • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      May be, but I don’t think apps use it. Afaik Teams, Discord and such are all epectron apps, yet they have not much in term of dependencies and large install sizes, so they must ship with their own versions.

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You don’t understand. This way if some app crashes it will not cause others to crash too.

      This is how google introduced the “multiprocess architecture” of Chrome.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can still have separate processes and everything else with a shared runtime, you just save having all this wasted storage with every application bringing its own bundled runtime.

        .net or Java applications work in a similar way, one Java app crashing won’t take out another just because they’re sharing the same runtime

        • rdri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’d rather not have frameworks based on web browsers. Programming is not that difficult.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            For most uses of electron I’d agree, but if some engineers are going to use it anyway, I’d prefer the approach I’ve described.

            Programming is not that difficult.

            Learning how to do something in a new language and framework isn’t that tough, I agree, but no one is going to become an expert in something overnight. I don’t reckon many desktop native engineers are choosing electron unless they actually need it, so if you imagine the case of an expert web engineer building a desktop UI, they’re going to do a much better job with their main skillset than something they have just learned.

            • rdri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              but no one is going to become an expert in something overnight

              It’s not like they need to become experts. But also that’s actually possible (at least the effects of that), especially with all the AI around.

              • 9point6@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                It’s not like they need to become experts

                I mean if they would produce a better UI by using their expertise, how would not becoming an expert in the new thing be better? The reality is that the people paying the engineer are going to want the better UX over the benefits of not using electron in most cases.

                But also that’s actually possible

                Respectfully, no it’s not, not with software engineering unless you’re talking about learning a simple library or something.

                If someone can genuinely master something in a day it wasn’t much of a skill to begin with.

                I’ve been in this industry for about 20 years now, I would find it very hard to believe an engineer who says they’ve gone from no knowledge to expert in a new framework/language in any short period of time. I would either assume they’re trying to pull a fast one or more charitably just in the “naively confident” phase of learning:

                especially with all the AI around.

                AI can assist you if you more-or-less know what you’re doing, but a novice replacing proper learning with ChatGPT pairing is going to write some shitty code. I use AI in my role semi-regularly, and in my experience, no model has consistently produced me anything (non-boilerplate) longer than a couple of lines that didn’t need some kind of refactor for it to actually be up to our code quality standards. Sometimes you see them spit out some ancient way of doing things that have been outright replaced by a more modern approach, if you don’t have the experience, you’ll not know any better.

                • rdri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I mean if they would produce a better UI by using their expertise, how would not becoming an expert in the new thing be better?

                  I failed to understand the meaning of this sentence. It doesn’t make sense to me. Producing a better ui is not even on the table when we are talking ui frameworks and native programming - you use what’s available, and if you are a graphics designer then maybe you should’ve sticked to that instead. Becoming expert in native ui is super cool but I wouldn’t expect such miracles from everyone. Just producing a valid low level code is enough to meet my standards of performance. That’s because those standards were heavily affected by web frameworks existence.

                  The reality is that the people paying the engineer are going to want the better UX

                  And I hoped it would be customers who would pay for a software or a service who would send valid feedback.

                  AI can assist you if you more-or-less know what you’re doing

                  Assuming web devs creating apps don’t know what they’re doing?

                  but a novice replacing proper learning with ChatGPT pairing is going to write some shitty code.

                  Chances are that code would be much more optimized than anything electron/CEF wrapped.

                  to actually be up to our code quality standards

                  Quality standards are great. But seeing companies shipping fixes to simple CSS issues that were breaking some of main app functions made me realize most of them don’t care about quality standards. If that’s how it is and if there will still be a lot of broken stuff across app updates - might as well just go all the way to proper low level languages.

  • leaveWitX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Haha, WeChat is even more outrageous than this. All your forwarded files will be automatically stored again. Your chat records will always be stored on the disk, but WeChat will tell you that the chat records have expired. In addition, it has recently been discovered that every Once you log in to WeChat, your avatar will be saved more than ten times

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can actually delete the data for good in both the android and windows software through the interface, and it works. But yeah the amount of data is staggering.

      I’ve got a reminder in my calendar to delete the data on the first day of a new quarter, so this here is accumulated since April 1st:

      image

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        “android is good” mfers when they have to manually set a calendar task to notify themselves to manually delete the bloated information for an app that they have installed.

        no shade to you specifically, but it pisses me off how much android users circle jerk over it being better than IOS, even though it’s like, moderately less annoying.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      And that’s also a lot for an app that doesn’t have that many binary assets like images or videos. I do wonder what makes up most of these sizes. I see other apps that are arguably more complicated - like AntennaPod - using under 40MB; So I guess it has to do with actual native apps vs cross platform ones.

      • baatliwala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your phone has bigger problems if it cannot take 170mb apps, this isn’t the 1990s

        • rdri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s a very bad way to look at things. Just because I have gigabytes of memory doesn’t mean I want to use unoptimized software.

          • baatliwala@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            And your way to look at things that “all apps must be 20 mb or less otherwise they are unoptimised” is better because?

            • rdri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Because optimized software is better for industry, people, and environment. Also seeing that some menu or window is not an html page but a native element makes my headache go away because I value my CPU cycles (seeing a cursor doesn’t lag when some complex page is displayed should not be considered a weird fetish) and like it when things don’t do stupid unnecessary stuff both visually and under the hood.

              And it could be even less than that depending on specifics.

        • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          If developers optimized their apps, we could have phones that are 10x faster than 10 yeara ago. Instead they are the same speed and the same amount of apps fit in the bigger storage, because developers are lazy and use heavy, unoptimized technologies that use 10x the resources

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That sounds like a problem with YOUR phone. Every phone I’ve bought has been faster than the last. Maybe you have too much bloatware?

            I use open source Android only, will not use a phone with stock android. Bloatware is a non-issue on AOSP unless you do that to your own phone.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, I’ve been having a lot of issues with Electron which is basically a browser emulator. It has gotten huge, so applications using it have gotten out of control in size. I get that it’s a quick way to build a cross platform application, but there really needs to either be a better way to distribute it that is more modular, or people need to start building on better cross platform front-end systems.

    • alyth@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      i am doing a full system upgrade and something wants to build chromium from source. i let it run in the background and cloning the repository alone has downloaded 33GB wtf 😭

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I had to move away from Arch Linux because lots of apps you have to build and Electron was one of the biggest culprits for using tons of disk space and time because it builds Chromium in its entirety from source. Electron is a great way to shift the cost of cross platform development from you to your customers.

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well dooh, you installed Chrome with it. Add to that their application and there you have it.

  • Vilian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    the solution could be deduplication, not sure if microsoft store has it, or windows supports it, this help with the size, bot not ram usage

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Windows doesn’t support deduplication itself (though ntfs does support hardlinks if someone wanted to do it). It actually won’t help here because every electron app bundles different versions in practice.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sadly, it’s the only way I can contact someone to buy a decent quantity of weed in this state. I get less even if I go to a state where it’s legal and I pay more.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s so sad about it? You have the ability to securely send E2EE messages for free. I’m very pleased with Signal after using it for years.

      If you mean it’s sad about the weed being hard to get / illegal… yeah, I concur. Hopefully Schedule III happens soon and nationwide Medical will be legal.