• Urist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Many of these have C-bindings for their libraries, which means that slowness is caused by bad code (such as making a for loop with a C-call for each iteration instead of once for the whole loop).

    I am no coder, but it is my experience that bad code can be slow regardless of language used.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Bad code can certainly be part of it. The average skill level of those coding C/C++/Rust tends to be higher. And modern programs typically use hundreds of libraries, so even if your own code is immaculate, not all of your dependencies will be.

      But there’s other reasons, too:

      • Python, Java etc. execute their compiler/interpreter while the program is running.
      • CLIs are magnitudes slower, because these languages require a runtime to be launched before executing the CLI logic.
      • GUIs and simulations stutter around, because these languages use garbage collection for memory management.
      • And then just death by a thousand paper cuts. For example, when iterating over text, you can’t tell it to just give you a view/pointer into the existing memory of the text. Instead, it copies each snippet of text you want to process into new memory.
        And when working with multiple threads in Java, it is considered best practice to always clone memory of basically anything you touch. Like, that’s good code and its performance will be mediocre. Also, you better don’t think about using multiple threads in Python+JS. For those two, even parallelism was an afterthought.

      Well, and then all of the above feeds back into all the libraries not being performant. There’s no chance to use the languages for performance-critical stuff, so no one bothers optimizing the libraries.

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 months ago

        Java is still significantly faster and more efficient than Python tho - because it has ahead-of-time optimizations and is not executing plain text.

        • Ptsf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          Idk numpy go brrrrrrrrrr. I think it’s more just the right tool for the right job. Most languages have areas they excel at, and areas where they’re weaker, siloing yourself into one and thinking it’s faster for every implementation seems short sighted.

          • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            At it’s heart, numpy is C tho. That’s exactly what I’m talking about. Python is amazing glue code. It makes this fast code more useful by wrapping it in simple® scripts and classes.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Faster, sure. Efficient, fuck no. With Java you have to run around and write ton of boiler plate code to do something simplest in nature.

          • deathmetal27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            Could say the same for C/C++.

            But yeah I’d like it if the features given by Lombok were standard in the language though it’s not a big deal these days since adding Lombok support is very trivial.

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You shouldn’t use Lombok, as it uses non-public internal Java APIs, which is why it breaks every release. At one point we had a bug with Lombok that only resolved if you restarted the application. Switching off of Lombok resolved the issue.

              Just switch to kotlin. You can even just use Kotlin as a library if you really want (just for POJOs), but at this point Kotlin is just better than Java in almost every way.

              • deathmetal27@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                I agree but I have tried like hell to get my team to use Kotlin but it’s hard to convince upper management. The team is reluctant to switch as well.

                Using Lombok is the next best thing.

                Though for POJOs that are immutable you can use record classes now.

          • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I’m mainly talking efficiency in terms of energy use. I won’t deny that some ugly decisions have been made with Java :D

            • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Energy use? That’s a pointless metric. If that is the goal then whole idea of desktop should be scraped. Waste of memory and hard drive space. Just imagine the amount of energy wasted on booting GUI.

                • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  If you want to talk about climate change then electronics is the wrong place to point the finger at. For start look at cement manufacturing. It requires huge amounts of energy to produce even though we have eco-friendly variants ready to go. And cement production amounts to 8% of all greenhouse gasses released annually.

                  Hell, just ban private jets and you’ve offset all of the bad things datacenters ever made. Elon had 10 minute flight to avoid traffic which consumed around 300l of fuel. Royal family makes so many flights a year that you could go into the wild and eat bark until the rest of your life and you wouldn’t be able to offset their footprint in thousands of lives.

                  Bill Gates himself talks a lot about reducing carbon footprint we make and yet he refuses to sell his collection of airplanes. He has A COLLECTION of them.

                  Using higher level language that requires more operations than assembler is not a thing to worry about when talking about climate change. Especially without taking into account how much pollution have those managed to reduce by smartly controlling irrigation and other processes.

    • aluminium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      At least with Java, its the over(ab)use of Reflections and stuff like dependency injection that slows things down to a crawl.