• Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Is it really worth the cost after 144 Hz, though? Are there applications for a higher refresh rate than the human eye can even see?

      • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thanks for the answer!

        I know there’s no numbered fixed limit on the human eye, obviously, but it seems like beyond a certain screen refresh rate our eyes wouldn’t really notice a difference, yeah?

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      For Joe Everyman with a reaction time of 250-300ms it would probably not be worth the additional cost, but for esports players who have a reaction time of half that already it starts to matter more, especially for games that run synchronously on a tick system.