• deltapi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    My i5-4690 and i7-4770 machines remain competitive to this day, even with spectre patches in place. I saw no reason to ‘upgrade’ to 6/7/8th gen CPUs.

    I’m looking for a new desktop now, but for the costs involved I might just end up parting together a HP Z6 G4 with server surplus cpu/ram. The costs of going to 11th+ desktop Intel don’t seem worth it.

    I’m going to look at the more recent AMD offerings, but I’m not sure they’ll compete with surplus server kit.

    • Deway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d say that regardless of the brand, X86 CPU don’t need to be upgraded as often as they used to. No awesome new extension like SSE or something like that, not much more powerful, power consumption not going down significantly. If you don’t care about power consumption, the server CPU will be more interesting, there’s no doubt about that.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They’re still useful, but they’re not competitive in overall performance with recent CPUs in the same category. They do still compete with some of the budget and power-efficient CPUs, but they use more power and get hotter.

      That said, those 4th gen Intel CPUs are indeed good enough for most everyday computing tasks. They won’t run Windows 11 because MS locks them out, but they will feel adequately fast unless you’re doing pretty demanding stuff.

      I still have an i5-2400, an i7-4770K and an i7-6700 for occasional or server use, and my i7-8550U laptop runs great with Linux (though it overheated with Windows).

      I buy AMD now though.