• Cybermass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    In torn between following my dreams and dedicating my life to attempting to help the climate crisis by going to school and inventing some tech to help

    and giving up entirely, coasting through life with my stable government job, and drinking to forget until the day I hang myself…

    This world is fucked, should I even try? Or should I just hope in reincarnation?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem isn’t tech to help the environment, as far as I can tell. It’s more getting the people in charge to actually do something about it.

      I think the French once invented a device for that, I forget what it was called.

    • zalack@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      IMO, it’s always better to try. Worst case scenario is that nothing changes, so no worse than if you didn’t. The only sane choice in that kind of situation is to pick the one with a chance for improvement.

      In my experience, giving a shit about what you’re doing has a bunch of positing knock-on affects as well. You just end up feeling better about yourself. In your specific scenario it sounds like trying would also afford you the opportunity to live a happier life, and that’s worth chasing. The world is fucked, but scientists keep saying they if we act soon it’s not so fucked they we’re past the inflection point to un-fuck it.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lots of planets out there, maybe another has life, and you can be snail-like creature on beta-kapsilon 114-3b

        • Asafum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s looking more and more depressing on that front too…

          Apparently we’re discovering that our type of star system with its long periods of stability and lack of local disruptive bodies is incredibly, incredibly, rare… There are a (literal) astronomical amount of systems out there so there’s no way we’re the only one with life, but it’s really looking like there could only be a “handful” of others out there :/

    • DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One could argue that we (humans) are doing exactly what we are meant to do and that the climate change isn’t a ‘problem’ on the grander scale.

      Change is only ‘bad’ based on perspective. Climate Change could also be the pressure catalyst that drives evolutionary change. The pressure exerted on coal underground could be considered ‘bad’ for the coal but it also drives the transformation of coal into diamond.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is exactly why I dislike the phrase climate change. Outside of academia, it should be ‘climate catastrophe’. Or maybe ‘sixth mass extinction’. Those are much less ambiguous.

    • huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Listen to Kim Stanley Robinson’s interview on chapo trap house. Something comes next, we just can’t see what that is.