the Logitech F710 is a solid controller to get if you’re on a tight budget, but perhaps not exactly the type of equipment you want to stake your life on. […] Reviewers on sites like Amazon frequently mention issues with the wireless device’s connection.

The reporter, who followed an expedition of the Titan from the launch ship, wrote that “it seems like this submersible has elements of MacGyver jerry-riggedness.”

      • ArtieShaw@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a hard agree. I work in a highly regulated industry and literally every new dude who joins the company says some version of “I don’t see why we can’t just…” and proceeds to describe some moderately to highly illegal shit. Every single one.

        It’s wild. I think they honestly believe they’re the first person to think up these completely obvious and simple “solutions” to problems that require some degree of control and complexity.

      • blivet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        At my old job the director of my department had a poster up that said “move fast and break things”, but he also demanded 99.9999% uptime.

      • remmon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially when the previous smaller version of the same design, with the same materials, had problems with it coming apart a few years back.

    • comicallycluttered@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      innovation often falls outside of the existing industry paradigm.

      Lol, the fuck is this even supposed to mean? Just say regulations. You know, honesty, with a touch of bullshit at the end.

      Something like:

      "Regulations are too difficult to deal with when you’ve got a substandard machine which wouldn’t pass any of the requisite safety tests.

      If someone happens to die, we’ve determined this to be acceptable collateral.

      This is also known as innovation."

    • Thrashy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The good news is, the hubris is already in a can. The bad news is, the can is several thousand feet under the North Atlantic.

  • omnilynx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was about to defend this (the US military uses XBox controllers for subs & drones), but then I saw that it was off-brand. No excuse for that.

    • Killer_Tree@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, we use XBox controllers to operate remote cameras for pipeline inspections and they usually survive far longer than is reasonable considering some of the abuse we put them through. That being said, I have no idea about the quality of Logitech, but at the very least they should have had a backup controller available as it would have a small footprint and be a huge failsafe.

  • Thndrchld@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man. That’s the control you give to your little brother because you don’t want him to get the good control all sticky.

  • underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some journalists did a story on this thing a while ago and it got lost for about 5 hours. During this time one of the reporters asked if it had some kind of beacon or transponder to locate it in situations like this. Their reply was something along the lines of “oh yeah that’s probably a good idea.” They never added it.

    • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lack of an emergency transponder is their biggest problem, followed shortly after by the inability to exit without outside help (which is literally what killed the Apollo 1 crew over 50 years ago). Next up, as pointed out in another thread, is that the sub is made of extremely brittle materials because that makes it lighter. Honestly, using off the shelf components for the controls doesn’t worry me nearly as much as those other issues.

      • TEKUMS@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The more I hear about this the more I’m shocked that this death trap was allowed to operate at all! It seems on the level of that bear suit guy, super dyi energy but with no real use case.

        • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You want to be more shocked? The pilot was the CEO. He was willing to risk everyone’s lives and his own on this folly.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could afford to pay $250k for a vacation, and they voluntarily rode this deathtrap?!

      Proof positive that being rich doesn’t make you smart.

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Especially when you have to sign a waiver that literally reads:

      “This experimental vessel has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body, and could result in physical injury, emotional trauma, or death.” Source

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I saw a video of this submersible. The view was through a TV. Imagine going to the bottom of the damned ocean to look at the Titanic on a TV.

  • Gork@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used the F710 so that our family can couch co-op in the living room. For a Logitech controller it’s pretty solidly built and is of the era where Logitech peripherals were of good quality (unlike now, rip new G503s). I noticed that the wireless range kinda sucked if it didn’t have direct LOS to the receiver, but it has good rumble feedback and I like the smooth matte black underside material (feels good to the touch).

    • Satiric_Weasel@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bu would you stake your life, and the lives of others, on it performing well thousands of meters below the ocean?

      I used, and loved, a cheap little Logitech keyboard for years before it died on me. Wouldn’t Jerry-rig it into my car and use it as my steering apparatus though.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t even stake my Elden Ring playthrough to a cheap third party controller. I’ve been playing consoles since the early 1990s and there has never been a time where 3rd party performs better than 1st party.

  • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems like a really bad idea to use a wireless controller instead of a wired one. But I guess it shouldn’t matter as long as they have a backup wired controller in case the wireless one dies.

  • ArtieShaw@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy shit. BBC has a short video that shows the interior of the sub and how it’s controlled. It’s a featureless tube with one button and the wireless controller. I wasn’t expecting the submersible from Life Aquatic, but I wasn’t expecting anything like what’s shown in the video.

    I think this is how you make a link? Like in wiki markup

    here’s plain text if that link doesn’t work.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-65953941

  • Calcharger@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So is everyone else thinking they accidentally fucking plowed into the Titanic because a controller input got stuck?

    • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pretty unlikely. It’s easy to dunk on them for the controller, but they apparently carried backups, and it’s nowhere near the most concerning thing about their operations. It’s much more likely that their extremely brittle carbon-fiber hull fatigued (again), their homegrown acoustic fatigue detection system didn’t detect it (or it did and they ignored it), and the ship was crushed in a fraction of a second.

    • Anomander@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That or lost connection/battery.

      The only wireless controller I ever owned would continue any repeating input active when connection dropped, if batteries or wifi died; they could just be cruising at max speed off in whatever direction they were facing, until the motor batteries run dry.

      You’d like to think they’d carry backup interface, or even just use a wired controller, but this whole op sounds pretty McGuyver top to bottom.

  • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What an absolute shit way to die: freeze to death from hypothermia due to the electric heaters running out of battery, crushed to death by water pressure compressing you inside a compartment, or drown to death in a dark unforgiving cold that strips you completely from all hope as it slowly rises and takes your precious air.

    • mobyduck648@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s barely a consolation but I read that during the Thresher submarine disaster the men would have been killed in 1/20th of a second, too fast for their nervous systems to process the implosion.