• kevin@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yep, you send me html, my browser can interpret it any way that I want it to. If I want to ignore all of the image and script tags, I can. I don’t need Chrome or even Chromium. As Stallman says, you should know what is running on your system.

    • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      We need to go back to html and css. Using an ad blocker and noscript literally breaks webpages. I just want to read the article! You know the content ppl actually come for

      • flameguy21@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s such a bizarre situation. Either you heavily limit Javascript and basically destroy all web apps or you embrace it and get laughably slow websites with walls of ads that beg you to log in to actually view the page. Like if you look into it, it’s genuinely shocking how much software is a web browser running JS under the hood.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can see legitimate uses for java script, like popping out a menu. But it seriously needs its capabilities restricted.

        • ngdev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          needs its capabilities restricted

          This is a bad take. How are you gonna do that? Force ECMA to scrap all the functionality deemed ‘bad’? Wave a magic tech wand? At the end of the day JS is a tool, and like any tool it can be abused for nefarious purposes. The issue is that advertisers abuse this tool, and the sites they pay to be shown on allow it. Not because insert scripting language exists.