TL;DR

  • Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
  • The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
  • Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
  • FutileRecipe@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve got old apps that won’t work any more.

    I’m actually for this. The bar to entry for the Play Store is too low with too many low quality and unmaintained apps. I’m all for booting insecure and super old apps. They cheapen the ecosystem.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well that’s all very well, but I’ve got a bathroom speaker I can no longer access.

      So how about instead of Daddy Google deciding what’s best for everyone, they let things run and give you a warning?

      Hell, I’ve even got games I’ve paid for that are now gone. Honestly, fuck them for even thinking that’s acceptable.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Same, it’s why I never buy a game or app nowadays, they will just stop working when the new OS version comes around, devs already got their money so they don’t have any incentive to care, and contrary to PC I can’t do shit about it myself on my phone, there’s no “androidbox” to run old apps inside my phone.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You’re really arguing for a covenant around tech that companies want to orphan. The rule needs to be the code is opened and a slacker code owner is appointed for handover.

        This is gonna embarrass Google a Lot but it’s gonna embarrass azn and m$ a whole lot more.

        The forced alternative is a refund if you can bring something recognizable with a serial number to your post office or something as ubiquitous, present and staffed - have them validate in the loosest fashion and require like 10 bizdays for the cash refund.

        Whether or not the post office is there for that or charges the OEM for the notary-light service is a matter for the courts, the USPS, and these days probably the fn SCotUS.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        So how about instead of Daddy Google deciding what’s best for everyone, they let things run and give you a warning?

        That is not what’s happening. It takes tons of work to maintain backward compatibility but you’re framing it as though it doesn’t and they’re just being a holes on purpose.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          It doesn’t allow direct connection. You have to dick about with a stupid app to put it in “speaker mode” first.

          • Gingernate@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Damn that sucks!!! I wish there was a way to sandbox older apps. I’ve ran into the same issue with old apps before.

          • LinusSexTips@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Gives me Sonos vibes.

            I won a Sonos speaker years ago, thing needed (from memory) an app to switch to AUX mode. The speaker sounded great but I didn’t want to install an app just to use the thing.

            In a grand spectacle my ex’s cat kicked a potplant off a windowsill into our fish tank. That shorted a power board, we didn’t have breakers (ceramic / wire fuses) which ended up killing the speaker.

            Honestly as nice of a speaker it was, good riddance.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          So it’s my choice to run them?

          If I can download an APK, I should be able to run it in a “compatibility mode” and have the OS do it’s best to run it.

          • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            It can’t.

            A compatibility mode would involve meaningful cost, massively compromise security, and not have a chance in hell of working.