• BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Without knowing much about Lemmy I would guess that a bit more info is needed, along with some human interaction on both servers to validate the move.

      When I signed up i wrote a bit about why I chose that server, I think that as a minimum would also be required.

      Edit: I would also only allow moving between servers at the 1st of each month, just to cut down on work for the admins.

  • Kinglink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s three big problems with this.

    A. You’re now allowing people to hop, and even name change. Let’s say they’ll allow that. But I think both of those are things that will have to be agreed upon if it’s done at all.

    B. You’re missing the password. Every instance should have a unique salt, passwords should NEVER be reversible, and never be stored insecurely (AKA before salting the hash for instance). I use a different password for every site, but I’ve had sites tell me “Your password is X” … holy shit that’s a HUGE security flaw for multiple reasons.

    So if I’m migrating and don’t need to set a new password, that’d be questionable.

    C. This can be done unscrupulously. If I get control of someone’s account, I can migrate it and essentially steal all their accounts and posts. For 99 percent of us who cares, but let’s say there’s a post from “Justin Bieber” and I get his account, migrate it, use a new password, and now make his posts say “I don’t suck cocks”…

    It’s probably more important when it’s a big game studio who posts update and such to Lemmy somewhere but the point is accounts will have a huge value eventually, letting you migrate it with a click might be dangerous.

  • scytale@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I discovered this a couple of days ago: https://github.com/CMahaff/lasim. It just transfers your subscriptions to your new account in another instance. I don’t really mind not being able to transfer comments for now, but this has been very very helpful when I moved my subscriptions from one of my lemmy.world accounts to another instance because of the recent downtimes.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea this is what should be aimed for in the middle term. Anything bigger involves a number of technical chalenges.

      But being able to migrate your “setup” to another instance is the middle ground that will actually doable in the short term and a rather significant improvement in the user experience.

      “Setup” would include subscriptions, and any further details about subscriptions that may come along like user defined multi-subscriptions etc, settings, cakeday (suggested elsewhere in the comments and a wonderfully human suggestion), blocks etc.

  • cheer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    They might just go Masto-style migration and just but a banner on your profile linking to your new account, and give you a list of communities to import.

    • SamXavia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      @cheerjoy I think in the long-run of the Fediverse it would be better if we can fully export all of our data to a new instance sure maybe still have a redirect account on the original instance you where using but it would be good for not only people that want to move instance to another popular instance but also if someone creates there own allowing you to try out the Fediverse before spending the time running your own instance as apart of it.

  • ferret@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think migration should just do all of the non-public stuff, like subscribed+blocked communities and saved posts

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So would it delete the original account or copy ? I think this could be done with a client app

  • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not convinced that this is a problem that needs to be solved. The value of the federation is that your data is fleeting and not guaranteed. I’m not sure why anyone in the federation needs to guarantee the existence of your data long term.

    • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because people form attachments to their accounts, and allowing them to keep their info can promote federation (encourage people to use other instances, especially since most people start off on one of the big instances).

      I get what you’re saying, but I think there is a practical purpose for allowing migration. That being said, I think working on the UI before thinking about how migration would work in practice might be putting the cart before the horse