• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It absolutely is tho. Usually more precise, 1:1 translatable into written text, can use the superior 24h system and uses the same reading system that is already taught in school anyways.

      • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Ususally more precise” > This depends on how precisely it is set, not on the display. Unless it’s a connected watch, but then it’s much more expensive and less energy efficient.

        “1.1 translatable into written text” > Both are, you’re reading the same number

        “Uses the superior 24h system” > Adding 12 to a number isn’t complicated. And with habit, most people who use analog watches and the 24h system know which position of the needle means what number in 24h format without doing the math. Some clocks don’t even have digits. Unless you’ve been sedated and woke up in a room without windows, you’ll know which side of 12 you’re on. And otherwise, you’ve got more pressing issues.

        • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I was ready to hate it but after a good look, it doesn’t look that bad. Doesn’t work for small wristwatches but could look nice for a big wall clock.

    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wristwatches are just jewelry at this point tbh. They’ve been rendered completely redundant by cell phones. The only people under 60 who wear them are doing so as a fashion statement.

      I’m sure a lot of wristwatch stans will downvote me but I don’t care I’m still right

      • newfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Wristwatches don’t have the negative psychologically addictive and anxiety-producing effects of smartphones

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        For office attire or going out, sure.

        If you’re doing repair work, running lines, etc, a watch is the choice. Your hands are busy, so a watch is what you need (Except for specific trades where you don’t want to risk it getting caught in machinery).

        I can say with 100% certainty that I know large swaths of folks in their 20’s and 30’s who regularly wear watches. Some smart, some digital, some analog.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I use my wristwatch all the time to take dogs’ pulses.

        Having a cell phone next to a grumpy dog is asking for a broken cell phone. I’m sure people in other fields need wristwatches as well.

        Just because you don’t use them don’t mean they’re not useful.

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m a watch nerd with a collection of mechanical watches and I’m not going to downvote you because you’re right. I wear them because I like them even though I know they are anachronistic. I can’t remember the last time I interacted with somebody significantly younger than me who was wearing a watch, and as I said, I’m a watch nerd, someone’s watch is one of the first things I notice about them.

        I will say that they are occasionally more convenient than other places I could check the time but I’ve built my life in such a way that I very rarely have to care about what time it is and I go weeks at a time without checking the time, just wearing them because I’m fascinated by tiny gears and springs doing their business and I like the feeling of it on my wrist.