• hexbatch@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everyone hates php and cobol, and use their scripts dozens of times each day.

    I hate php but have to write in it ( help me). I still won’t touch cobol.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I fantasize about being one of those extremely well-paid Cobol consultants when I reach the later stages of my career. Hoping that I can earn a full year’s salary in 3-4 months and take the rest of the time off as a semi-retirement. It would be easier said than done, but it’s a dream that helps me get through the days when I get sick of the daily grind.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think those jobs are a myth. You probably get like a 20% premium for using COBOL, so if you look up the salary of a Cobol consultant in America it’s going to seem like an enormous salary on an absolute scale.

        But so is a C++ consultant in America or whatever. Probably not worth learning COBOL for.

        Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, but I have looked once or twice and the COBOL salaries seemed entirely normal.

        • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re probably right. I think COBOL development is one of the cases where the crazier stories are the ones that bubble to the top. The regular scene is probably more mundane.

          I do think there are a few advantages to learning COBOL over C++. COBOL seems to be much stickier - companies that use it seem much more hesitant to replace it than a lot of the companies that use C++, and as a result, they will probably get more desperate. And while there’s definitely a lot more C++ out there than COBOL, I have to imagine that the number of people under 50 that use COBOL is probably tiny, while C++ still has a very large userbase. On the other hand, consulting depends a lot on your portfolio, references, and past accomplishments, and nobody’s going to pay 1k EUR/USD/etc. per hour (exaggerating, obviously) if you don’t have any credentials. It takes time to build that up.

          Ultimately, I do think you’re pretty spot on, but we’ll have to see. This is more just a fantasy I tell myself to make it seem like retirement is closer than it probably is…

      • stuckgum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That won’t happen. There were many Cobol consultants at my previous job, and they earned less than in house engineers on different stacks.

    • urquell@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Cobol is in demand through legacy. Not sure if that qualifies as popular

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s a markup language(ish) but it’s not a programming language. XML would be closer to programming, IMHO, since you could have simple things like recursion. That example is even pushing what I would consider “programming”, but anyone can feel free to disagree.

      SQL is in the same category for me. It’s a query language and can get super complex, perform some basic logic, but you can’t exactly write “snake” in it. Sure, you could use cmdshell or something else to do something more complex, but that would no longer be SQL.

      My simplistic expectation of an actual programming language would be that you can automate an entire platform at the OS level (or lower) instead of automating functions contained within a service or application. (JVMs and other languages that are “containerized” are weird outliers, by my definition.)

      I am not trying to step on anyone’s toes here. I just never have really thought about what I personally consider a programming language to be.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s a markup language(ish) but it’s not a programming language. XML would be closer to programming, IMHO, since you could have simple things like recursion.

        One could also view it a different way:

        XML merely provides abstract structure. It doesn’t direct that anything be done. By itself, it doesn’t program anything.

        HTML, on the other hand, directs web layout engines to produce outputs. It programs them.

        SQL is in the same category for me.

        SQL directs databases to manipulate data and relations, and to produce results. It programs them.

        Imperative and functional programming are often what come to mind first, at least for many of us, but declarative programming is nevertheless programming.

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Pushing HTML even further, one could say it’s a declarative programming language that programs a UI in a mostly-stateless manner (inputs aren’t really stateless but you can argue the state is provided by the UI rather than managed by HTML).

          I’m not sure I’d make this leap myself though, I have a hard time classifying it (or any other markup language) as a PL. As far as I am aware, you can’t really program a state machine with pure HTML, though you can accept inputs and return outputs at least.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        What can I say, I agree with you. This mixing of markup, query and general programming languages is not exactly a good comparison

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    If starting out: on web, Python and Typescript will take you far. On mobile, Swift and Kotlin. On Windows/Mac, C# and Swift. You’re on your own for Linux desktop.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      C#/.NET supports Linux quite well and there is Avalonia for UI. Also there is a cross platform trend amongst modern languages such as Kotlin/Jetpack - not that I’m too keen on this approach.

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      On the web I would stick entirely with Typescript. There are plenty of server side Typescript systems; you don’t need to resort to Python.

      Most recently I’ve been using Deno’s Fresh framework which is fantastic. Very easy to use and suitable for beginners IMO since you can start with traditional request per page & static templated responses - no complex state management.