The Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has said he hopes the crisis surrounding the social network X in Brazil might teach the world that “it isn’t obliged to put up with [Elon] Musk’s far-right free-for-all just because he is rich”.

Lula’s comments to the network CNN Brasil came after the supreme court voted unanimously on Monday to uphold the ban on X, which is now largely inaccessible in one of its biggest global markets.

The suspension was first ordered on Friday as a result of the company’s refusal to obey court orders requiring the removal of profiles accused of spreading disinformation and for the social network to name a local legal representative.

MBFC
Archive

  • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ordinarily, I might agree. However, this suspension is because musk refused to appoint a legal representative for the company in Brazil, IAW Brazilian law. That’s a reasonable ask for a company that’s actively doing business in the country. If a billionaire* crybaby refuses to follow the law, then he gets to deal with the consequences. FA meet FO.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s not what the article says, the article says it’s because X refused to ban users and because of that. Not just because of that

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        4 months ago

        You should read up on the whole ordeal. The article is failing to summarize the lengthy legal battle that’s been happening between them for years since Musk’s takeover.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, from what I understand when X appoints a legal representative they will then be held responsible for refusing to ban. Is that wrong?