flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoOpenAI Pleads That It Can’t Make Money Without Using Copyrighted Materials for Freefuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square360fedilinkarrow-up11.47Karrow-down132
arrow-up11.44Karrow-down1external-linkOpenAI Pleads That It Can’t Make Money Without Using Copyrighted Materials for Freefuturism.comflop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square360fedilink
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up72·1 year agoIf your company can’t exist without breaking the law, then it shouldn’t exist.
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoI disagree. Laws aren’t always moral. Texas could outlaw donations to the Rainbow Railroad and it would be wrong, the organization should still exist. But in this case it is pretty clear that the plagiarism machine is in fact, bad and should not exist, at least not in it’s current form.
minus-squaredrislands@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI feel like in that case one would be loudly fighting to get the law changed, rather than insisting it’s actually fine. Maybe that’s just semantics.
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t think the people who are supporters of jury nullification are saying such laws are fine.
If your company can’t exist without breaking the law, then it shouldn’t exist.
I disagree. Laws aren’t always moral. Texas could outlaw donations to the Rainbow Railroad and it would be wrong, the organization should still exist.
But in this case it is pretty clear that the plagiarism machine is in fact, bad and should not exist, at least not in it’s current form.
I feel like in that case one would be loudly fighting to get the law changed, rather than insisting it’s actually fine. Maybe that’s just semantics.
I don’t think the people who are supporters of jury nullification are saying such laws are fine.