Does AI actually help students learn? A recent experiment in a high school provides a cautionary tale.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania found that Turkish high school students who had access to ChatGPT while doing practice math problems did worse on a math test compared with students who didn’t have access to ChatGPT. Those with ChatGPT solved 48 percent more of the practice problems correctly, but they ultimately scored 17 percent worse on a test of the topic that the students were learning.

A third group of students had access to a revised version of ChatGPT that functioned more like a tutor. This chatbot was programmed to provide hints without directly divulging the answer. The students who used it did spectacularly better on the practice problems, solving 127 percent more of them correctly compared with students who did their practice work without any high-tech aids. But on a test afterwards, these AI-tutored students did no better. Students who just did their practice problems the old fashioned way — on their own — matched their test scores.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The point of learning isn’t just access to that information later. That basic understanding gets built on all the way up through the end of your education, and is the base to all sorts of real world application.

    There’s no overlap at all between people who can’t pass a test without an LLM and people who understand the material.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        We learned that calculators hinder learning. Arithmetic is a core competency you can’t do algebra without, let alone higher math.

        I really have no idea why you’re asserting the opposite so confidently. Calculators are not beneficial.