• Isoprenoid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How does pirating make a corporation broke? Making a copy doesn’t steal money.

    Edit: We can’t pirate a company into bankruptcy.

    • dch82@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Because they keep whining that they’re losing money /s

      EDIT: added /s

      • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have an automated setup that can torrent the same game 100000 times so I can make corporations go broke at the click of a button. Fear me

        • dch82@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have a collection of 10000 classic Nintendo games on an HDD so I can make Nintendo America file chapter 11. Fear me

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We can’t pirate a company into bankruptcy because there are still people paying for the movies and games we download. If everyone pirated content, these companies would go bankrupt, and there would no longer be new content to pirate. Online pirates often justify their behavior by telling themselves a story about how they’re ‘sticking it to the man,’ but in reality, we’re just freeriders enjoying the fruits of others’ labor. We’re leeches with no moral ground to stand on.

    • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, they have to pay licensing fees for the media, pay crazy money for the IT infrastructure, which they have no matter how many downloads.

    • WhyAUsername_1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You didn’t pay up to enjoy the product. They lost revenue. But yes, it didn’t “broke” the corporation.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      In fact, you’re helping them promote their stuff. E.g. everyone is watching that TV show and it’s all your friends are talking about. Now you have to do it too.

      If instead of pirating you’d be like “I think it’s extremely expensive to pay a subscription fee for this low tier content, so instead I’ve been reading X”. Maybe you’d convice someone to join you. But for now you’re just reinforcing the media monopoly.

      • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So now i should stop doing everything involving a digital subscription that’s fun just to stick it to the corpos? I don’t know if I’m misunderstanding your argument

        • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          You want to portrait yourself as an anti-corpo warrior. But all you’re doing is making corpo content a mainstream monopoly, and through that they will eventually find a way to make someone pay for it.

          You will only make corpos go broke if you actually spend some money on alternative content. Meaning that content will get better, and there will be some follower base to enjoy that content with.

          • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I guess i can see the appeal of that idea if you’re willing to give up the variety of content you would otherwise have access to by sticking with corporations. I think Lemmy is a good example of this idea. I just can’t find it within me to give up the massive amounts of content available to me particularly when it comes to gaming and film.

            I mean think about it. I won’t play GTA6 so as not to contribute to the oligopoly Rockstar games is associated with. I mean i get your point - small changes make big differences right? - but it’s not always feasible to abandon all the good stuff that’s out there all in an effort to promote individual innovation.

            • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I will pay for their single player if reasonable, I’ll probably pirate cuz their shitty online tracking made GTA5 not even worth playing legally for free. A pirated version would’ve worked much better and wouldn’t require their fkn launcher social club disaster.

              But absolutely surely I’ll know I’m not an anti-corpo warrior. Just a tiny rebel insignificant enough to ignore. And I only matter a tiny bit, because I actually would’ve bought their game if it was on GOG.

              And if everyone always bought on GOG only, you’d see a much, much stronger presence on that platform.

              Till then their answer to you will be “hey you’ve been playing this game and your friends did too, well in order to play together it’s 10$/months, good luck pirating that”.

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How are you this naive? You know someone has to pay the developers a salary right? How would corporations pay them if nobody bought the game and instead pirated?

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you aren’t stealing them they aren’t stealing your content or work with AI. This pirating isn’t stealing bullshit is tired. Some backwards ass way to justify stealing someone’s right to distribute their work and get paid.