• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    TbF a medical device company would charge even more, they would be twice as ugly and they would probably suck at playing music.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        TbF assuming you are talking about US, my pet unicorn could just heal me with her laser eyes as this is slightly more likely to happen than a functional healthcare system.

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You would rather be indirectly gouged by a no-name brand that creates an inferior one-off product than buy an Apple product.

        This is the hill you chose and no amount of government healthcare can save you from it.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          My mother already has bluetooth in ear hearing aids that you cannot see. Quit jerking off Apple, edgelord.

          • Clent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Cool. Every tech paper I’ve read has said how terrible their hearing aids are compared to AirPods, so your anecdote is meaningless.

            Also, did that hearing aid retail for under $300?