• 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Nobody claims it was harmless, but it sure was very low on the harmless scale – especially if you compare it with every fear monger’s favorite, Chernobyl.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Lots of people claim it was harmless because relatively few people died. They have to focus on just one statistic (and a very unreliable at that) to prop up their delusions.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t worry it probably won’t be long before the houthi rebels or some other terrorist state backed crazies manage to successfully launch an attack on a nuclear power station somewhere then you won’t have to keep hearing about three mile island, chernobyl, Fukushima, the windscale fire, sizewell leaks, or any of the other times nuclear power has gone dangerously wrong.

      Thankfully Isreal doesn’t have nuclear power plants because it’s obviously too dangerous, let’s hope Russia, Iran, China, or any other well funded powerbase don’t get pushed into a corner and see funding an attack on a western nation as a viable response. Or some wacky religious group, race war proponents, attention seeking crazies or any of the usual suspects get as lucky as the 911 hijackers.

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      In all the famous cases, Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island, and Sellafield, it was close enough to a real disaster. Sure, only some people died, some more got radiation poisoning, cancer, even more lost their pets, their homes, their livelihoods, quite some animals died… thank god that’s “low on the harmless scale”.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        And don’t forget the trillions and trillions it has already cost and will cost in the future to clean this shit up. But that gets paid by the taxpayer, so that’s OK, right?

        • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          Exactly. There’s a reason no insurance company wants to take on nuclear power plants and countries have to.

          • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            In Germany, the state paid for all the research and development and then gave it to the companies for free. Then they massively subsidised the construction of the plants. Then the private companies got to reap the profits while the plants were running. And now the government is stuck with the bill for decommissioning. Totally not a racket.