• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.

    While it’s likely there were civilians hurt by this, the target was undeniably Hesbollah. So no, not terrorism.

    • erenkoylu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Israel is a terrorist organization. Radical, fundamentalist Jewish terrorism.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        National order isnt based on tit for tat. If someone commits a war crime against you it doesnt mean you get to do it too.

        In my opinion the time of day they chose to blow them shows they wanted as much collateral damage as they could.

        What’s the advantage of making excuses for committing war crimes?

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Is there any time of day it’s not atrocious? Seems like any time would have basically equal risk for collateral casualties.

          To be effective it all had to be at once. It seems that they waited until the pagers were being used to coordinate a fresh wave of rocket attacks with promises of more to come before setting them off.

          • villainy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is there any time of day it’s not atrocious? Seems like any time would have basically equal risk for collateral casualties.

            Then maybe it shouldn’t be done at all.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Maybe all an army has to do to take over the entire world is bring their families to the front. Can’t shoot back at them because their families are there. So they pretty much win every engagement. Problem solved. No more wars.

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I wasn’t trying to say that at all. Wars are fought where they are fought. It’s up to whoever is in charge of the area to make sure they are evacuated.

                  The people in charge of the area in Gaza (Hamas) do the opposite, that’s why they are designated as a terrorist organization and not legitimate government, such as the taliban in Afghanistan.

                  An illegitimate, criminal organization, that so willfully disregard the public welfare and trust, has no right to fight anywhere.

                  Let’s dispel the bullshit idea that Hamas is fighting for the lives and rights of the Gazan people. If Hamas wants to have a state so bad, they should start by looking out for the interests of their own people instead of constantly leading them into worse suffering. Taking part in international terrorism and killing Jews is more important to the leadership of Gaza then is feeding their people and until it’s not Gaza is irredenta.

                  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Where would the people evacuate to? Why is it always assumed thats a valid option?

                    I’m not condoning violence but all of these better options people listed have been tried over and over, and Palestinians were dieing long before October 7th.

                    Look up how many palestinian children the IDF killed in 2023 prior to the attack.

                    Tell me what’s the right answer when another group of people controls your life and kills your family members.

                    Israel has been just as if not more violent than Hamas, its bullshit to defend them. Defending themselves my ass, defenders don’t steal land.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Because that time of day is when the most people will be out in public. It seems deliberately designed to cause as much damage as widely as possible. Likely to cause fear in the population.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              They put explosives in the pagers but no shrapnel, so how does your conclusion make sense? If Israel wanted to simply cause mass damage, this would be a most incompetent way to do it.

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Terrorism is illegitimate. Fear is only a small part of one definition of the term.

                  This was an attack by military on military. They were using the pagers to coordinate the rocket attacks against Israel that they e been launching lately.

                  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Sorry I was being vague. Its an attack meant to cause terror in the civilian population as well. Its considered indiscriminate because while they knew who had the pagers at a point in time, when they did decide to blow them they couldnt know who would be hurt. In my opinion thats a line too far to cross.

                    It might also have to do with the fact that I consider people who are fighting in their own land to be both civilians and militants. Thats besides the actual civilians, if its even possible to live in some of these areas and truly avoid contact with “bad people”.

                    I don’t buy all this eye for an eye stuff going around, people are shit judges of themselves let alone other people.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would agree with this if they somehow only harmed Hezbollah severely. That was not the case.