• azl@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This would ideally become standardized among web servers with an option to easily block various automated aggregators.

    Regardless, all of us combined are a grain of rice compared to the real meat and potatoes AI trains on - social media, public image storage, copyrighted media, etc. All those sites with extensive privacy policies who are signing contracts to permit their content for training.

    Without laws (and I’m not sure I support anything in this regard yet), I do not see AI progress slowing. Clearly inbreeding AI models has a similar effect as in nature. Fortunately there is enough original digital content out there that this does not need to happen.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Regardless, all of us combined are a grain of rice compared to the real meat and potatoes AI trains on

      Absolutely. It’s more a matter of principle for me. Kind of like the digital equivalent of leaving fake Amazon packages full of dog poo out front to make porch pirates have a bad day.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well it means they need some ability to reject some content, which means they need a level of transparency they would never want otherwise.