• babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What UI? Both browsers render one line with tabs and the address bar below. They’re almost identical.

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For reals. This is the browser equivalent of being concerned that your car only has 14-way adjustable seats instead of 16, or whatever the marketing team dreamed up last year.

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What exactly is “clean” about a ui that doesnt conform to the os ui standards…? The ui is basically bloated because of it.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Could you be more specific? I’ve been using ff regularly for a long time now and never feel like the UI is getting in the way, though I do use a tab groups add-on to help manage my mess of open tabs. But I also haven’t used Chrome for even longer than I’ve been using ff, so I’m curious about what specific ways you think the chrome ui is better.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          In my UI (on desktop), tabs take up the title bar and all the other necessary buttons fit in the row with the address field. I’ve also got a bookmarks bar below that but it’s optional. There’s also the optional sidebar that I do use but mostly keep hidden.

          For menus, there’s the tab menu that is a button on the tab row and is mostly filled with open tabs plus 4 other items. Then there’s the main menu with 19 items. Tbf, one is undesired (log in for sync) and at least 7 are redundant (as in if they weren’t there, I’d still have easy access to their functionality), but I find menus are easier to discover features through (and hate how MS wants to get rid of them) and am ok with the redundancy.

          There’s also various context menus, but I’ve never found them to be obtrusive.

          This is the state after some customization, but not a crazy amount. If I install FF on a new system, I can usually get it to a point where I’m happy with it pretty quickly.

          If you mean the mobile version, I can understand that a bit more but personally prefer the screen space to be used up to expose more functionality. On mobile, I’ve felt like FF gives me the most power that feels closest to what I can do on a desktop, though tbf it’s been a while since I used other browsers (excluding electron stuff or apps that integrate Chrome or Google Web view for web browsing rather than letting me use my preferred browser, though I’ve never felt happy with the more minimalist UI instead of the capabilities FF exposes).

          I also haven’t tried librewolf and don’t know if the same UI is possible there.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I actually like the UI of the mobile version. I am also used to Firefox at this point but when I first moved it was painful. I think they should polish up the UI and focus on minimalism I stead of cramming in new features