The images of people being burned alive posted on social media and broadcast on news channels sparked a wave of shock and horror among those watching the devastation.
I got genuinely curious, and so I asked ChatGPT to write a less biased headline. I got this: “Israeli airstrikes target Hamas militants hiding in civilian areas, leading to tragic collateral damage at a hospital in northern Gaza.”
“World Socialist Web Site”. No wonder the headline is so biased.
Is it biased if it says exactly what happened?
The headline is heavily biased towards reality, here’s a few more sources supporting the headline
Israel attacks hospital in northern Gaza: https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c80r2y47rz4t
intensifies attacks, Jabalia has been intensely targeted over the last couple weeks: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-kills-least-40-gaza-tanks-deepen-raid-north-2024-10-15/
People at the hospital were burning alive: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/israel-gaza-hamas-hospital-bombing-rcna175237
And genocide intent: https://law4palestine.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Database-of-Israeli-Incitement-to-Genocide-DECISION-MAKERS.pdf
Nah they’re just being a dick
Wait… which part of this headline is biased exactly?
Versus all the capitalist websites that refuse to call it a genocide.
How would you rewrite it, o paragon of impartiality?
I got genuinely curious, and so I asked ChatGPT to write a less biased headline. I got this: “Israeli airstrikes target Hamas militants hiding in civilian areas, leading to tragic collateral damage at a hospital in northern Gaza.”
Lol, yea that’s not unbiased. That’s an IDF press release title.