• towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    If only that was the government that invested in the R&D and tech to make it happen.
    Gaining funds from taxes (meaningful taxes), and investing that money in making their country better.

    Hopefully this decision is because carbon taxes that will make consumer products representative of the actual cost of the item (not the exploitative cost). >

    No no, let the free market decide.
    Fucking AI threatening to replace basic jobs (when it’s more suited to replace the C-Suite) gobling up energy and money, too-big-to-fail bailouts and loophole tax rules bullshit.

    So yeh, someone needs to spend the money and that should be the government.
    Because they should realise that carbon fuel sources are a death sentence.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m glad you don’t make the decisions because I don’t want my taxes, that I work hard for and pay money into, to be spent by the government on highly-likely dogshit experimental brand new nuke tech that may eventually cost more money later on to maintain, and I prefer they spend it renovating existing infrastructure or building tried/true legacy nuke plant designs.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your taxes already go towards this.
        That’s how governments leverage capitalism to placate the people. Grants for green energy initiatives.
        Private companies get free money for taking some amount of risk because they are likely to profit massively from it.
        https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/nuclear/google-agrees-to-multi-reactor-power-deal-with-nuclear-startup-kairos
        Kairos is getting free money (grants & tax breaks) and profits from this. Google is extremely likely (can’t find a source) to be getting free money for this

        Companies EXIST to extract profit.
        Of one of the worlds most successful companies is doing this, it’s because “line goes up”.

        I’d prefer this happend so that “humans survive”.
        But “humans don’t die faster” is fine for now.

        (I guess “humans” means “poor humans”. As in anyone that doesn’t outright own 2 homes.)