Dot.@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoX's idiocy is doing wonders for Bluesky.htxt.co.zaexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1403arrow-down116
arrow-up1387arrow-down1external-linkX's idiocy is doing wonders for Bluesky.htxt.co.zaDot.@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareuis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down2·13 hours agoBluesky is decentralized only in its name. And media storage.
minus-squareSl00k@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-26 hours agoThis isn’t necessarily true. Just because their architecture is harder and not a simple server host does not strip away its decentralization. They have decentralized the following: App access (can build your own or show openProto posts in your platform Algorithms Relay (backend albeit rumored to be expensive) More if you consider the domain name hosting stuff and media storage control. Also moderation is planned to be decentralized.
minus-squaregndagreborn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·12 hours agoBetter than the burning garbage inferno that is xitter.
minus-squarehelopigs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·12 hours agobut for how long?
Bluesky is decentralized only in its name. And media storage.
This isn’t necessarily true. Just because their architecture is harder and not a simple server host does not strip away its decentralization.
They have decentralized the following:
App access (can build your own or show openProto posts in your platform
Algorithms
Relay (backend albeit rumored to be expensive)
More if you consider the domain name hosting stuff and media storage control. Also moderation is planned to be decentralized.
Better than the burning garbage inferno that is xitter.
but for how long?