• d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think this is pretty troubling. Including myself in the sentiment that the self-hosting community needs to do better. Aside from funding individual projects, are there any organizations that help fund self-hosting projects?

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      How so? 40%-ish is actually pretty good!

      I’m also in the “no” bucket, but I’ve contributed bug reports and do intend to donate soonish now that I use more visible projects (used to just be minidlna, BTRFS, and openSUSE). I only added Jellyfin a few months ago, and I do intend to donate since I don’t intend to report bugs or contribute code.

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        True, it’s a good percentage, and probably better than most free software. That said, given the communities the self hosted apps support, their excitement for the products, and for some the essential nature of some of these apps, it would be nice to see the yes/no number more 50/50 at least.

          • Alk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I have subscribed to a couple projects on github (the recurring payment thing) and purchased the optional immich license. I think the immich license is a great model, and more projects should do it.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Agreed. Grayjay has something similar, though it’s not actually FOSS (it’s source-available though). I’m happy to pay for software, but donating somehow has a different feel to it and doesn’t feel as “necessary.” So yes, an optional license fee would be awesome for more projects and could encourage more people to actually pay.

              • Alk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I love that it doesn’t unlock any features, but it does prominently display in the app as “activated” or whatever. It feels like “yeah, I have paid my portion, I am now entitled to use this forever guilt-free”

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t wanna ask if and how much individuals contributed to the ones that host their instances ;)

    • justcallmelarry@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m in the no-bucket, but instead i spend time on issues, helping the community and sometimes code contributions to self hosted projects instead.

      This is not taken into the account of the question, however, but should be considered as contributing.

      (I also consider donating to be contributing.)

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed. I’m not much of a coder, so the best contribution I can give is probably $$. At least until I get off my ass and learn something new!

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I also think that it is up to the developers to make it sustainable

      If they want funding they need to seek it. It has been shown that when a project has a one time donation popup they can raise a significant amount of money. They aso could sell products or services.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wish there were more commercial services around Foss. (And I don’t mean proprietary)

        They could do all sorts of things like sell swag and support.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m pretty sure that Pop OS isn’t the product but I absolutely see what you are saying. I’m talking about things like commercial support for companies and maybe some sort of user facing service but I’m not sure how that would work.

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The sad part about Matrix is that it isn’t supported, it is used. I think the blame is about 50/50. Users should donate and the leadership shouldn’t of assumed that companies would give them money.

    • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      100% of my self-hosted projects are run exclusively by my recurrent donations.

      Good thing nobody’s asking about what I’ve donated to the software projects I’m using to self-host.

  • cellardoor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Really interesting to scroll through and see. Picked up a couple of new tools to look into, too, thanks!

  • filcuk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    How does one self-host Obsidian? Does that just mean file sync? What am I missing?

    • retro@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I only need to send sign up and password reset emails for Jellyfin, I don’t need to receive any emails back.

          • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The question before was “Are you self-hosting any components of an e-mail server?” and if you answered “No” you didn’t get to choose the client. And a webmail client is not part of what I consider an email server component without context.

            But the survey also has other questions that are not clear enough. Like “Do you deploy a network-attached storage device (NAS)?” - what do they mean by NAS? As soon as I have network shares on it, it can be considered as a NAS. Do they mean all in one solutions like Synology or Qnap? Then why not make that more clear?

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t see any of the graphs. The show as a black box.

    This despite disabling Canvas Blocker on the page for testing. According to my briwser, loading the resources from “cdn.jsdelivr.net” is blocked due to a CORS failure.

    Aren there by any chance image dumps of the charts in any normal graphics image format? Or even jpeg-xl, for variety.

  • Gg901@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Greetings, i noticed Linux is the most popular OS by a majority amount. Which Linux OS is probably the most used and why is this? Is Linux prefered to host ZFS Samba shares rather than tailored OS’s like Unraid, Trunas, OMV?

    • Owljfien@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t want to accidentally cache some no-no content that gets me turbofucked by the law, sure I could probably defend if it ever came up but that’s a stress i dont even want the possibility of having in my life

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      I sort of get it. When you self host mastodon or lemmy, you have to deal with the moderation that comes with it. That’s a headache unless you have a ton of free time. Judging by the age distribution, I’m guessing most of us just want things to work so we can do what we enjoy.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lemmy uses activity pub right? 200 in a survey hosting similar stuff is not that bad IMO.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s alright! We don’t all have to host our own instance. Existing ones can easily accommodate hundreds of users.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why? I’m not particularly interested in ActivityPub, I just use Lemmy because it’s the closest thing to Reddit w/o being Reddit. Once a better alternative shows up, I’m out.

      I’m happy to throw some money at the admin of my instance, I’m not interested in hosting something myself, especially when things can break when different instances are on different versions.

        • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I just don’t see the use of self hosting these just for myself. I guess that’s why so little people do this?