Tux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoGoogle creating an AI agent to use your PC on your behalf, says report | Same PR nightmare as Windows Recallwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up1434arrow-down14
arrow-up1430arrow-down1external-linkGoogle creating an AI agent to use your PC on your behalf, says report | Same PR nightmare as Windows Recallwww.tomshardware.comTux@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square84fedilink
minus-squareNocturnalMorning@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·2 years agoHow do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.
minus-squareGetOffMyLan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoI bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this. Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well. You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails. Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy. You just aren’t the target audience.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoI could see the appeal as open source, self hosted software. Not from data vacuums.
minus-squareDarkThoughts@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years ago*privacy respecting We all know this is meant for data hervesting.
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoThey are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel. They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative. Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.
minus-squareFrozengyro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoThey will implement it, they are just trying different methods until one sticks.
minus-squareuis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years ago It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product. Because it is. That’s why it is called enshittification.
minus-squarespyd3r@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoShareholders are the customers now. People are livestock to be milked dry, worked to the bone, and chopped up and served to corporations.
How do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.
deleted by creator
Nationalize AI companies.
I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.
Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.
You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.
Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.
You just aren’t the target audience.
I could see the appeal as open source, self hosted software.
Not from data vacuums.
*privacy respecting We all know this is meant for data hervesting.
They are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel.
They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative.
Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.
They will implement it, they are just trying different methods until one sticks.
Because it is. That’s why it is called enshittification.
Shareholders are the customers now. People are livestock to be milked dry, worked to the bone, and chopped up and served to corporations.