• Rookwood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Poverty figures made a record jump of 11 points in the span of six months.

    All they needed is to sacrifice the poor. Poverty is now at 53% in the country.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      After a 49% poverty left by the previous government. So a tick of 4% after that is almost nothing

      People voted him for a reason

      • Poach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean that’s a 10% (almost) change. I’d consider that significant for a population.

            • Shardikprime@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Then I’d ask you to correct your comment, just to keep the information clean.

              Beyond that, In the large scheme, it was bound to happen due to lifting the extremely subsidized price controls on food, rent, transportation, health and the heavily subsidized services.

              It’s not pretty but it had to be done.

              The country was literally printing money they don’t have to pay things they couldn’t afford

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is terrifying news for the MMT crowd though as it’s pretty good proof their theory is bullshit.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          MMT argues that government printing money isn’t inflationary, and inflation can be controlled with taxes. Argentina had massive inflation while spending and taking on debt, and magically it’s gone down as measures to stop that spending were implemented.

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Is that right? I thought the general notion is that demand outpacing supply causes inflation. Doesnt printing money inherently increase demand? That’s why the Fed raised interest rates to fight inflation in the US, it slows money down by making things more expensive (in simplistic terms).

            • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              To MMT the printing of money is only inflationary when a country doesn’t have additional productivity. Thanks to digital products and services though l, production is nearly infinite. Others argue that all printing of money is inflationary.

              The Fed only really has interest rates as a tool, so they raise it when inflation goes up. It can fight inflation by slowing lending, which thanks to fractional reserve banking is the primary source of money being printed/created.

              • jacksilver@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Seems I need to read up more on the specifics of MMT. It feels like you keep contradicting yourself between your posts, but maybe I’m just missing something?

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    If this success lasts a long time, it will almost certainly guarantee a dystopian future for all of us.