The paper correctly gives the reference dose for BDE-209 as 7,000 nanograms per kilogram of body weight per day, but calculates this into a limit for a 60-kilogram adult of 42,000 nanograms per day. So, as the paper claims, the estimated actual exposure from kitchen utensils of 34,700 nanograms per day is more than 80 per cent of the EPA limit of 42,000.
Article content
That sounds bad. But 60 times 7,000 is not 42,000. It is 420,000. This is what Joe Schwarcz noticed. The estimated exposure is not even a tenth of the reference dose. That does not sound as bad.
I’m sure it’s a concern still but lmao the level of concern changed quite a bit
Moving a comma in a chemical calculation is something that can have a severe impact. Like that guy calculating the amount of explosives for a firecracker…
I’m sure it’s a concern still but lmao the level of concern changed quite a bit
Moving a comma in a chemical calculation is something that can have a severe impact. Like that guy calculating the amount of explosives for a firecracker…