Or am I the only one remembering this opinion? I felt like it was common for people to say that the internet couldn’t be taken down, or censored or whatever. This has obviously been proven false with the Great Firewall of China, and of Russia’s latest attempts of completely disconnecting from the global internet. Where did this idea come from?

  • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I moan about it regularly but this…

    Rather than flock to corporate platforms like Facebook, people spent a lot of time on federated and independent platforms. This included Usenet, IRC, and BBSes

    Is just tragic isn’t it? We really had it. A global free flow of hobbies, interests, research, debate, exploration.

    I don’t know what’s so fundamentally flawed about human nature a) that something that started so well like facebook gets enshitified to the extent that it has and b) why people flock to it like flies round a steaming turd

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The answer to your second point is simple.

      Meta’s properties (FB, Insta) have something that most other social networks are lacking: A network of real-world family and friends.

      Twitter, Reddit, Mastodon, Lemmy, Tiktok, and the rest all tend to have communities built from the platform’s population, based on shared interests. Meanwhile, FB is the platform that you use to connect with your oddball uncle and high school friends from way back. That’s the sunk cost that makes it so much harder to leave than the strangers on reddit who share your love of lime jello.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s a truism in writing; villains act and heroes react. If someone looks at the internet and sees a way to exploit it they will. They don’t care that it’s working fine for everyone else; they want the money.