• Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      They’re both anti-consumer; the difference is in the degree.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          61
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Button that doesn’t look like a button.

          Unclear phrasing…

          Now, am I saying it’s impossible to understand? No. Do I think it rises to the level of law-suit worthy? Barely.

          Is it anticonsumer and intentionally designed so as to make it more difficult to unsubscribe and put up barriers to get people to stay? Absolutely.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      A lot of people are dumb. Half the world’s population has a below average intelligence.

      Why should we allow companies to victimize dumb people? Why is that ok to you?

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          I fail to see how it’s a strawman. Either you’re ok with companies taking advantage of people because they’re not very intelligent or you’re not.