• Mountaineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So you won’t use your banks website?
    Or your utilities (gas/water/electricity/internet)?
    You won’t let your kids use the portal at their school for submitting assignments?
    Your government sites for renewing your drivers license or scheduling hard refuse pickup?

    I can think of lots of reasons that will force me to have chrome installed if this goes ahead.

    • yukichigai@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your government sites for renewing your drivers license or scheduling hard refuse pickup?

      As a government programmer, let me assure you that we’re so goddamn far behind modern tech we’ve only just stopped supporting IE6.

        • yukichigai@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In all seriousness we make sure things work with modern browsers, but you’re never going to find a government agency requiring the latest and most advanced tech. For one thing, nothing in government moves fast enough to make that even remotely possible.

          Also there’s no way I’m gonna learn how to use some new piece of tech every few months. They don’t pay us nearly enough for that kind of effort.

          EDIT: Oh but I wasn’t kidding about dropping support for IE6 recently. It was like a year or so ago, not last week, but still.

        • yukichigai@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          State of Nevada in my case, but I’ve worked with a lot of other state and federal agencies. Pretty much all of them are like that. At best their legislatures will get a wild hair and spend a bunch of money on some off-the-shelf “latest and greatest” product (not really, it’s usually something like Salesforce) and they’ll be top of the line for a few years, but when it comes to actually keeping it upgraded and cutting edge that never happens.

    • gnuplusmatt@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can think of lots of reasons that will force me to have chrome installed if this goes ahead.

      it might even go as far as being chrome on a supported OS (win/mac/cros/android with google play services)

    • digdug@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work on the website for a medium sized utility, and will definitely resist implementing this.

      I have been trying to convince my manager to let me switch to an authentication solution that supports webauthn, though.

      • Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        A manager only has so much power. Once the higher ups decide on things, nothing can be done. And we see too much examples of executive level people that are so out of touch.

        • digdug@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I was just thinking about this more, and what if Google decides to implement this on Google maps? Am I going to have to put a message up saying something like, “sorry, you can’t view our outage map unless you use a browser that supports web integrity”?

          Because you’re right, convincing the higher ups to let me switch to OpenStreetMap is probably going to be a losing battle.